01023827

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1941-23

http://scholar.google.com...usso&publication_year=2005

Even before FHWA’s focus on ecosystem conservation as part of its vital goals, the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) had begun to examine how and where compensatory mitigation was being implemented in the state. Over the past 4 years, NCDOT, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers–Wilmington District have partnered to redesign the mitigation process with one goal in mind: to create a compensatory mitigation program that delivers guaranteed environmental benefits. The result of these efforts is the Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP). Instead of focusing on individual highway project impacts, the EEP concept revolves around watershed plans and considers cumulative impacts associated with a given watershed. Accordingly, EEP provides cumulative mitigation for cumulative impacts. It was clear from the start that EEP was going to change fundamentally the goals, approach, and structure of providing mitigation in North Carolina. Although the mitigation experts knew how the mitigation process needed to change, they lacked expertise in how to manage that change. Not surprisingly, this has presented several hurdles that the sponsoring agencies are still trying to scale today. As implementation moves forward, many valuable lessons are being learned, which are laying the groundwork for successful change. This paper describes the origins of the EEP concept, outlines the implementation processes, discusses “change barriers” experienced and lessons learned, and provides an EEP progress report 2 years into the program’s implementation.

01023813

English

pp 175-183

2005

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

030909416X

Print

Figures (2) ; References (3)

Conservation; Ecosystems; Implementation; Lessons learned; Watersheds

Ecosystem Enhancement Program (North Carolina)

Barriers to implementation; Compensatory mitigation

North Carolina

Energy; Environment; Highways; Hydraulics and Hydrology; Research; I15: Environment

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

May 10 2006 2:50PM

• Accuracy of a Traffic Noise Model Using Data from Machine Vision Technology
• Analysis of 11 Bioengineered Stream Bank Erosion Control Structures in Alaska
• Basics of Noise Generation for Pavement Engineers
• Causal Analysis of Hydrogen Acceptance
• Comparison of Traffic Noise Model 2.5 with 2.1 and Measured Data
• Designing On-Road Vehicle Test Programs for the Development of Effective Vehicle Emission Models
• Effect of Fuel Economy on Automobile Safety: A Reexamination
• Energy and Emissions Impacts of Operating Higher-Productivity Vehicles
• Energy Efficiency, Fuel Economy, and Policy Implications
• Estimating Extended Idling Emissions of Heavy-Duty Diesel Trucks in Texas
• Evaluating the Ability of Global Positioning System Receivers to Measure a Real-World Operating Mode for Emissions Research
• Impact of Regional Simulation on Emission Estimates
• Introduction of Hybrid and Diesel Vehicles: Status Within the Life Cycle of Technology Adoption
• Measuring and Modeling Emission Effects for Toll Facilities
• Methodology for Developing Transit Bus Speed–Acceleration Matrices for Load-Based Mobile Source Emissions Models
• MOBILE6.2 Modeling of Exhaust Air Toxic Emission Factors: Trend and Sensitivity Analysis
• Multi-Agency Permitting Teams: Teamwork as a Critical Tool to Joint Delivery of Transportation and Environmental Protection Needs
• On-Road Vehicle Emission and Activity Data Collection and Evaluation in Houston, Texas
• Pile Driving and Barotrauma Effects
• Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Texas with High-Volume Fly Ash Concrete
• Streamlining Success of Southeast Arkansas Interstate 69 Connector Project: Integrating Geographic Information System and Stakeholder Involvement
• Surprises from a Field Validation of Speed Estimation Techniques for Air Quality Conformity Analysis
• Travel Characteristics of Urban Freight Vehicles and Their Effects on Emission Factors