01023792

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1940-07

http://scholar.google.com...Timm&publication_year=2005

The Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) has used a vendor to perform automated pavement condition surveys for the Alabama pavement network since 1997. In 2002, ALDOT established a quality assurance (QA) program to check the accuracy of the automated pavement condition data. The QA program revealed significant discrepancies between manual and automatically collected data. ALDOT uses a composite pavement condition index called pavement condition rating (PCR) in its pavement management system. The equation for PCR was developed in 1985 for use with manual pavement condition surveys; however, ALDOT continues to use it with data from automated condition surveys. Since the PCR equation was developed for manual surveys, the discrepancies between the manual and automated data led ALDOT to question the continuity between its manual and automated pavement condition survey programs. A regression analysis was completed to look for any systematic error or general trends in the error between automated and manual data. Also, Monte Carlo simulation was used to determine which distress parameters most influence the PCR and whether they require more accuracy. The regression analysis showed the following general trends: automated data overreport outside wheelpath rut depth, underreport alligator severity Level 1 cracking, and overreport alligator severity Level 3 cracking. Through Monte Carlo simulation, it was determined that all severity levels of transverse cracking, block cracking, and alligator cracking data require greater accuracy.

01023790

English

pp 55-62

2005

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

0309094151

Print

Figures (7) ; References (9) ; Tables (4)

Accuracy; Alligator cracking; Automatic data collection systems; Block cracking; Condition surveys; Data collection; Errors; Monte Carlo method; Pavement distress; Regression analysis; Simulation; Statistical analysis; Transverse cracking

Alabama Department of Transportation

Pavement condition rating; Rut depth

Data and Information Technology; Design; Highways; Pavements; I22: Design of Pavements, Railways and Guideways; I23: Properties of Road Surfaces

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

May 7 2006 5:02PM

• Accuracy of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Estimating Rigid and Flexible Pavement Layer Thicknesses
• Analysis of Long-Term Effectiveness of Thin Hot-Mix Asphaltic Concrete Overlay Treatments
• Assessment of Aging at FHWA’s Pavement Testing Facility
• Developing Roadway Standards for Ride Quality from the Customer’s Perspective
• Development of a Crack Type Index
• Evaluation of Top-Down Cracks in Asphalt Pavements by Using a Self-Calibrating Ultrasonic Technique
• Incorporating Variability into Pavement Performance, Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, and Performance-Based Specification Pay Factors
• Pavement Management System Based on Financial Consequence
• Prediction of Pavement Crack Initiation from In-Service Pavements: A Duration Model Approach
• Quantification of Pavement Damage Caused by Dual and Wide-Base Tires
• Rut Initiation Mechanisms in Asphalt Mixtures as Generated Under Accelerated Pavement Testing
• Superaccelerated Pavement Testing on Full-Scale Concrete Slabs
• Use of Pavement Management System Data to Monitor Performance of Pavements Under Warranty
• Wavelet-Based Multiresolution Analysis of Pavement Profiles as a Diagnostic Tool
• Wavelet-Based Pavement Distress Classification