00942579

Monograph

http://onlinepubs.trb.org...bs/nchrp/nchrp_rrd_275.pdf

An assessment was made as to whether the European 2+1 road design is suitable for use in the United States. A 2+1 road design has a continuous three-lane cross section with alternating passing lanes. This digest describes when a 2+1 design is likely to be effective and presents some recommendations for designing 2+1 roads. Visits were made to Germany, Finland, and Sweden to meet with agency staff, observe 2+1 roads in operation, and obtain data on their traffic operational and safety performance. Because of European experience, the use of 2+1 roads in the United States is recommended. It has been found that 2+1 roads improve the traffic operational level of service for two-lane roads without increasing their capacity. A 2+1 road will generally operate at least two levels of service higher than a conventional two-lane highway serving the same traffic volume. Also, a 2+1 road can operate safely and effectively in areas where minor intersections and driveways provide direct access to the roadway. Major intersections should generally be located in the buffer areas between passing lanes in opposing directions of travel and should have left-turn lanes provided. While 2+1 roads can operate effectively with no separation between the lanes in opposite directions of travel, AASHTO policy states that some separation, however small, between the lanes in opposite directions of travel is desirable. Therefore, a flush separation of 1.2 m (4 ft) between the opposing directions of travel should be considered, where practical. Sweden uses a cable barrier in a flush divider, Finland is considering their use, and Germany considers their use undesirable. It is recommended that use of cable barriers between the opposing lanes of 2+1 roads not be considered in the United States until a full evaluation of tort liability and barrier deflection issues has been completed.

Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved

English

31 p.

2003-4

NCHRP Research Results Digest

Figures (18) ; Photos (10) ; References (11) ; Tables (15)

Highway design; Level of service; Passing lanes; Recommendations; Study tours; Three lane highways; Traffic safety

Cable barriers

Finland; Germany; Sweden

Design; Highways; Research; Safety and Human Factors; I20: Design and Planning of Transport Infrastructure; I85: Safety Devices used in Transport Infrastructure

TRIS, TRB

May 20 2003 12:00AM