|
Title: APPROACHES TO EVALUATION OF PROFILER ACCURACY
Accession Number: 00968519
Record Type: Component
Record URL: Availability: Transportation Research Board Business Office 500 Fifth Street, NW Find a library where document is available Abstract: The inadequacy of the existing ASTM E950 method for definition of the bias of an inertial profiler in the measurement of a pavement profile is analyzed. An improved bias calculation method is proposed. An analysis of the profile measurements and international roughness indexes (IRIs) of four pavement locations was conducted, and the results show that there is no statistical correlation between the profile biases and IRI bias. This analysis demonstrates that a profiler classified as having high accuracy in measuring profiles by ASTM E950 or other proposed bias criteria does not necessarily provide an accurate measurement of IRI. Therefore, it is recommended that the accuracy of a profiler in the measurement of IRI be evaluated independently when IRI, instead of profile, is used for a smoothness specification or other purposes. A criterion to evaluate profilers' accuracy to measure IRI is developed based on the concept of probability.
Supplemental Notes: This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1860, Pavement Assessment, Monitoring, and Evaluation 2003.
Language: English
Corporate Authors: Transportation Research Board 500 Fifth Street, NW Authors: Li, YixuanDelton, JPagination: p. 129-136
Publication Date: 2003
Serial: ISBN: 0309085977
Features: Figures
(8)
; References
(2)
; Tables
(2)
TRT Terms: Identifier Terms: Uncontrolled Terms: Subject Areas: Design; Highways; Pavements; I22: Design of Pavements, Railways and Guideways; I23: Properties of Road Surfaces
Files: TRIS, TRB, ATRI
Created Date: Jan 8 2004 12:00AM
More Articles from this Serial Issue:
|