|
Title: ALTERNATIVES TO DIESEL FUEL IN CALIFORNIA: FUEL-CYCLE ENERGY AND EMISSION EFFECTS OF POSSIBLE REPLACEMENTS DUE TO THE TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANT DIESEL PARTICULATE DECISION
Accession Number: 00804663
Record Type: Component
Record URL: Availability: Transportation Research Board Business Office 500 Fifth Street, NW Find a library where document is available Abstract: Limitations on the use of petroleum-based diesel fuel in California could occur pursuant to declaration by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) that the particulate matter component of diesel exhaust is a toxic air contaminant subject to the state's Proposition 65. It is the declared intention of CARB not to ban diesel fuel, per se, at this time. Assuming no total ban, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) explored two feasible "midcourse" strategies that result in some degree of (conventional) diesel displacement. In the first case, substantial displacement of compression-ignition (CI) by spark-ignition engines occurs and diesel fuel remains admissible for ignition assistance as a pilot fuel in natural-gas-powered heavy-duty vehicles. Daily gasoline demand in California increases by 32.2 million L (8.5 million gal) overall, about 21% above the 2010 baseline demand projected by California's energy and environmental agencies. Daily natural gas demand increases by 13.6 million diesel L (3.6 million gal) equivalents, about 7% above projected (total) consumption level. In the second case, CI engines utilize substitutes having similar ignition and performance properties for petroleum-based diesel. For each case, ANL estimated localized air emission plus generalized greenhouse gas and energy changes. Fuel replacement by dimethyl ether yields the greatest overall reduction in nitrogen oxide emissions. All scenarios bring about fine particulate matter (PM10) reductions relative to the 2010 baseline, with greatest reductions from the CI-displacement case and the least from fuel replacement by Fischer-Tropsch synthetic diesel. Institutional and cost implications of vehicle and engine replacement were not formally evaluated.
Supplemental Notes: This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1738, Energy, Air Quality, and Fuels 2000.
Language: English
Corporate Authors: Transportation Research Board 500 Fifth Street, NW Authors: Saricks, C LRote, D MStodolsky, FEberhardt, J JPagination: p. 86-93
Publication Date: 2000
Serial: ISBN: 0309067413
Features: Figures
(6)
; References
(16)
; Tables
(1)
TRT Terms: Uncontrolled Terms: Geographic Terms: Subject Areas: Energy; Environment; Highways; Public Transportation; Railroads
Files: TRIS, TRB, ATRI
Created Date: Jan 12 2001 12:00AM
More Articles from this Serial Issue:
|