00798917

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1705-08

http://scholar.google.com...assi&publication_year=2000

Three types of devices that have been used in conjunction with marked crosswalks in an attempt to improve pedestrian safety were evaluated: an overhead crosswalk sign in Seattle, Washington; pedestrian safety cones (which read, "State Law: Yield to Pedestrians in Crosswalk in Your Half of Road") in New York State and in Portland, Oregon; and pedestrian-activated overhead signs (which read, "Stop for Pedestrians in Crosswalk") in Tucson, Arizona. The signs were used under varying traffic and roadway conditions. The effects of these three treatments on pedestrian and motorist behavior were evaluated. The variables of interest were whether pedestrians had the benefit of motorists yielding to them; whether pedestrians had to run, hesitate, or abort their crossing; and whether pedestrians crossed in the crosswalk. The New York cones and Seattle signs were effective in increasing the numbers of pedestrians who had the benefit of motorists yielding to them. At one location in Tucson, the overhead sign increased motorist yielding to pedestrians. The signs in Seattle and Tucson were effective in reducing the number of persons who had to run, hesitate, or abort their crossing. None of the treatments had a clear effect on whether people crossed in the crosswalk. By themselves, these devices cannot ensure that motorists will slow down and yield to pedestrians. It is essential to use these and other devices along with education and enforcement, but creation of friendlier pedestrian environments (e.g., by means of implementing geometric improvements) for the purpose of reducing vehicle speeds may be more important.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1705, Pedestrian and Bicycle Transportation Research 2000.

English

p. 43-52

2000

Transportation Research Record

0309066859

Figures (2) ; Photos (6) ; References (11) ; Tables (5)

Behavior; Crosswalks; Drivers; Messages (Communications); Overhead traffic signs; Pedestrian actuated controllers; Pedestrian safety; Pedestrian signs; Pedestrians; Traffic calming; Traffic cones; Traffic law enforcement; Traffic safety education; Unsignalized intersections

New York (State); Portland (Oregon); Seattle (Washington); Tucson (Arizona)

Education and Training; Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Safety and Human Factors; I73: Traffic Control; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Sep 13 2000 12:00AM

• ANALYSIS OF GAP PATTERNS IN LONGITUDINAL RUMBLE STRIPS TO ACCOMMODATE BICYCLE TRAVEL
• ANALYSIS OF PEDESTRIAN GAIT AND PERCEPTION-REACTION AT SIGNAL-CONTROLLED CROSSWALK INTERSECTIONS
• AUTOMATED DETECTION OF PEDESTRIANS IN CONJUNCTION WITH STANDARD PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTONS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
• CALIBRATING PEDESTRIAN LEVEL-OF-SERVICE METRICS WITH 3-D VISUALIZATION
• COORDINATING TRAFFIC SIGNALS FOR BICYCLE PROGRESSION
• CYCLING AND URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEMS
• EFFECTS OF TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES ON PEDESTRIAN AND MOTORIST BEHAVIOR
• EVALUATION OF BLUE BIKE-LANE TREATMENT IN PORTLAND, OREGON
• EVALUATION OF INNOVATIVE BIKE-BOX APPLICATION IN EUGENE, OREGON
• INFLUENCE OF EXPERIMENTAL PAVEMENT MARKINGS ON URBAN FREEWAY EXIT-RAMP TRAFFIC SPEEDS
• LOCATOR TONES FOR PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS
• MODELING OF BICYCLE ROUTE AND DESTINATION CHOICE BEHAVIOR FOR BICYCLE ROAD NETWORK PLAN
• NEW MODELING APPROACH TO MIXED-TRAFFIC STREAMS WITH NONMOTORIZED VEHICLES
• PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL POTENTIAL IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: A METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION'S APPROACH TO IDENTIFYING INVESTMENT PRIORITIES
• POWER OF THE LINE: SHARED-USE PATH CONFLICT REDUCTION
• SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT