00791507

Component

http://onlinepubs.trb.org.../circulars/ec011/ec011.pdf

The key to the success of the Florida Statewide Model's evolution has been the recognition that most trips within the state are under local influence. That is, only a small percentage of the person and freight trips exceed 50 mi (80 km) and even a smaller percentage venture past 200 mi (322 km). While many of the gravity modeling methodologies are often criticized when used with statewide models, these same methodologies have actually been the backbone of the Florida Statewide Model evolution. Early recognition of the importance of local transportation infrastructure on statewide transportation systems allowed Florida to disaggregate the statewide modeling process to include the broad array of urban, county, regional and special application models that constitute the Florida Statewide Modeling System.

Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved

00791504

E-C011

English

p. 51-54

1999-9

Transportation Research Circular

Statewide Travel Demand Forecasting

Disaggregate analysis; Forecasting; Gravity models; Infrastructure; Local transportation; Mathematical models; Travel demand

Florida

Freight Transportation; Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Passenger Transportation; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; Railroads; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB

Apr 10 2000 12:00AM

• A CONTRAST OF STATEWIDE MODELS FOR SMALL, MEDIUM, AND LARGE STATES
• COMMODITY FLOW MODELING
• MICHIGAN'S STATEWIDE TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL
• STATEWIDE TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING PROCESS IN CALIFORNIA
• THE EVOLUTION OF A STATEWIDE MODEL FOR NEW JERSEY
• THE KENTUCKY STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION FOCUSING PROCESS
• THE NEW HAMPSHIRE STATEWIDE TRAVEL MODEL SYSTEM
• THE OREGON STATEWIDE AND SUBSTATE TRAVEL FORECASTING MODELS
• THE RHODE ISLAND STATEWIDE TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL
• THE WASHINGTON STATE TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING DECISION PROCESS: FROM VISION TO PRODUCTS
• THE WISCONSIN MULTI-MODAL INTERCITY PASSENGER DEMAND FORECASTS