00781538

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1692-10

http://scholar.google.com...nell&publication_year=1999

Two new crossbuck designs for use at passive highway-railroad grade crossings were evaluated. The standard improved and the buckeye crossbuck were evaluated in Ohio with respect to their potential to alter driver risk-taking behavior (Part I), their accident reduction potential (Part II), user acceptance (Part III), and with respect to their photometric performance at night (Part IV). It was found that the percentage of noncompliant drivers was about the same for both crossbuck designs, with slightly more conservative risk-acceptance times obtained for the Buckeye crossbuck. Based on the past 10 years of Ohio railroad crossing (RRX) accident history, the overall number of accidents at passive RRX has continued to drop. Since the statewide installation of the two new crossbuck designs, no accident reduction pattern could be attributed to one of the two crossbuck designs. A user acceptance survey indicated an overwhelming preference for the Buckeye crossbuck among the user groups surveyed. Photometric crossbuck luminance measurements conducted under automobile low-beam illumination at night indicate that thanks to their increased reflectorization, both new designs provide superior visual stimuli to an approaching driver at night. The Buckeye crossbuck provides by far the strongest visual signal among the measured crossbucks at night. Amendments to the national standard for crossbucks at passive RRX in the "Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices" are recommended. Postreflectorization (four-sided) is recommended and the additional use of a striped, angled shield is recommended in situations that require a maximum visual stimulus, ensuring the shortest possible perception reaction times, and in situations that involve visual obstructions, frequent fog, or blinding snow.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1692, Traffic Signing, Visibility, and Rail-Highway Grade Crossings.

English

p. 82-93

1999

Transportation Research Record

0309071151

Figures (5) ; References (14) ; Tables (3)

Acceptance; Crash rates; Design; Fog; Night; Photometry; Railroad grade crossings; Reaction time; Reflectorized materials; Risk taking; Snow; Standards; Traffic control devices; Visual perception

Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Crossbucks; Visual obstructions

Ohio

Design; Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Railroads; I73: Traffic Control

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 27 2000 12:00AM

• ADVANCE WARNING FLASHERS: DO THEY IMPROVE SAFETY?
• BENEFIT SENSITIVITIES OF ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL STRATEGIES AT ISOLATED TRAFFIC SIGNALS
• CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN MESSAGES FOR WORK ZONES: TIME OF DAY, DAYS OF WEEK, AND MONTH DATES
• COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RURAL STOP-CONTROLLED AND BEACON-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS
• DRIVER PREVIEW DISTANCES AT NIGHT BASED ON DRIVER EYE SCANNING RECORDINGS AS A FUNCTION OF PAVEMENT MARKING RETROREFLECTIVITIES
• DRIVER'S SPEED REDUCTION BEHAVIOR AT HIGHWAY-RAIL INTERSECTIONS
• DRIVER-HEADLAMP DIMENSIONS, DRIVER CHARACTERISTICS, AND VEHICLE AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS IN RETROREFLECTIVE TARGET VISIBILITY CALCULATIONS
• EVALUATION OF UNASSIGNED SIGN COLORS FOR INCIDENT MANAGEMENT TRAILBLAZING
• INFLUENCE OF PAVEMENT SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS ON NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY OF OBJECTS
• LEGIBILITY OF TRAFFIC SIGN TEXT AND SYMBOLS
• PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF THREE FREEWAY GUIDE SIGN ALPHABETS
• RECOGNITION DISTANCES OF DIFFERENT PAVEMENT ARROW DESIGNS DURING DAYTIME AND NIGHTTIME
• STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SELECTED SCHOOL ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
• SUPERVISED INTERCONNECTION CIRCUITS AT HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS
• VIOLATIONS AT GATED HIGHWAY-RAILROAD GRADE CROSSINGS
• VISIBILITY OF ROAD MARKINGS AS A FUNCTION OF AGE, RETROREFLECTIVITY UNDER LOW-BEAM AND HIGH-BEAM ILLUMINATION AT NIGHT
• VISUAL TARGET DETECTION MODELS FOR CIVIL TWILIGHT AND NIGHT DRIVING CONDITIONS (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE)