|
Title: EXPROPRIATION FOR ADDITIONAL PIPELINE WILL NOT EXTINGUISH RESIDUAL VALUE AND WILL NOT SUPPORT CLAIMS OF SEVERANCE OR AGRICULTURAL USE DAMAGES
Accession Number: 00238626
Record Type: Component
Abstract: HUMBLE PIPELINE COMPANY OPERATED A PIPELINE ACROSS DEFENDANT'S LAND PURSUANT TO A PREVIOUSLY ACQUIRED RIGHT- OF-WAY AND SOUGHT TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL ONE TEN FEET FROM IT. THE DEFENDANT CLAIMED COMPENSATION FOR EXTINCTION OF RESIDUAL VALUE OF LAND, SEVERANCE DAMAGES TO HIS REMAINING PROPERTY, AND AGRICULTURAL DAMAGES FOR CROP LOSS. THE COURT HELD AGAINST DEFENDANT ON ALL THREE CLAIMS. CONCERNING COMPENSATION FOR ACTUAL LOSSES, PAST DECISIONS RECOGNIZE THE THE PREDICTIVE ELEMENT IN DETERMINING HIGHEST AND BEST USE AND DO NOT ATTEMPT TO APPLY SUCH A DETERMINATION TO ACTUAL LOSS SITUATION SUCH AS DESTROYED CROPS. (HUMBLE PIPELINE CO. V. WILLIAM T. BURTON INDUSTRIES, INC., 205 SO. 2D 724 (LA. APP. 1968)).
Supplemental Notes: No 89, pp 5-6. Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 1968-12
Serial: Media Type: Digital/other
TRT Terms: Uncontrolled Terms: Subject Areas: Highways; Law; Pipelines; Terminals and Facilities
Files: TRIS, TRB
Created Date: Feb 10 1994 12:00AM
More Articles from this Serial Issue:
|