|
Title: ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF OREGON CONDEMNATION CASES
Accession Number: 00238281
Record Type: Component
Abstract: SO MANY VARIABLES ARE PRESENT IN JURY CASES THAT JURY VERDICTS RETURNED IN CONDEMNATION CASES CANNOT BE ACCURATELY ANALYZED AND EVALUATED. ONE TREND DERIVED FROM A COMPARISON OF A LARGE METROPOLITAN AREA WITH A PREDOMINATELY RURAL AREA IS THAT TRIALS HAVE BEEN MORE SUCCESSFUL FOR THE STATE IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA THAN IN RURAL AREAS. VARIABLES THAT SEEM TO INFLUENCE THE JURY ARE PUBLICITY, PROVINCIALISM, AND PERSONAL REACTIONS TO WITNESSES, ATTORNEYS,ETC. IN CASES DECIDED FOR THE STATE, JURORS SEEM TO DETERMINE THE VALUE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN THE STATES HIGHEST APPRAISAL AND THE LANDOWNERS LOWEST APPRAISAL.
Supplemental Notes: Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Monograph Title: Monograph Accession #: 01410018
Authors: Lindas, Leonard IPagination: pp 31-34
Publication Date: 1964
Serial: Media Type: Digital/other
Features: Figures
(1)
; Tables
(1)
TRT Terms: Geographic Terms: Old TRIS Terms: Subject Areas: Highways; Law; Safety and Human Factors
Files: TRIS, TRB
Created Date: Apr 7 1994 12:00AM
More Articles from this Serial Issue:
|