00335152

Component

http://onlinepubs.trb.org...ubs/sr/sr192/sr192-024.pdf

Statewide study was undertaken in 1975 to understand issues surrounding displacement. Displacees from both urban and rural communities dispersed over a wide geographic area were studied and analyzed for social and economic effects of displacement. The results showed that less than one in five relocatees had negative feelings about the experience. Results also showed that the relocation program had served as a vehicle for renters to become homeowners, and original owners had upgraded their homes. A second study analyzed renter displacees from two standpoints: mobility and quality of current housing. A third study evaluated the use of a portable audiovisual system for use by right-of-way agents at public meetings. The results of these studies are briefly summarized.

Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. This paper appeared in Transportation Research Special Report No. 192, Relocation and Real Property Acquisition.

00335312

p 47

1981

Transportation Research Board Special Report

Relocation and Real Property Acquisition. Proceedings of a Conference

Digital/other

Audiovisual aids; Housings; Impact studies; Public hearings; Quality control; Relocation (Facilities); Relocation assistance; Research; Rural areas; Socioeconomic factors; Urban areas

Quality; Relocation

Virginia

Economics; Highways; Research; Society; I10: Economics and Administration

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Aug 15 1981 12:00AM

• ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES OF RELOCATED HOUSEHOLD HEADS: A CAUSAL ANALYSIS
• ATTITUDES, OPINIONS, AND EXPERIENCES OF RELOCATEES IN TEXAS DISPLACED BY HIGHWAYS UNDER THE 1970 RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
• CONDEMNATION BLIGHT
• CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND HIGHLIGHTS
• ELIGIBILITY FOR RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
• IMPACT OF RELOCATION ON PEOPLE, BUSINESSES, AND COMMUNITIES
• PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNIFORM RELOCATION ACT
• PROCESSES FOR GREATER UNIFORMITY
• PROPERTY ACQUISITION
• PROPOSED REVISIONS IN THE UNIFORM RELOCATION ACT
• REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND RELOCATION ASSISTANCE IN NEW YORK
• RELOCATION AND PROPERTY ACQUISITION: EXPERIENCE, PROBLEMS, AND PROSPECTS
• RELOCATION AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION IMPLEMENTATION BY COUNTIES
• RELOCATION ASSISTANCE IN NEW JERSEY
• RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
• RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM IN OKLAHOMA
• RELOCATION ISSUES OF CONCERN TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
• RELOCATION NEEDS AS SEEN BY PORTSMOUTH HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
• RELOCATION OF RESIDENTS DISPLACED BY CONSTRUCTION OF I-205 IN WASHINGTON
• RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND SERVICES
• RESIDENTIAL RELOCATION: IMPACT OF ALLOWANCES AND PROCEDURES IN OHIO
• SCOPE OF GSA ACQUISITION AND RELOCATION PROGRAM
• STATE PERSPECTIVE OF PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
• UNIFORM RELOCATION POLICIES IN THE 1980S
• WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE UNIFORM ACT?