00335142

Component

http://onlinepubs.trb.org...ubs/sr/sr192/sr192-013.pdf

New York State acquires property for public purposes through an administrative process. The legal authority for this method emanates from the Eminent Domain Procedures Law (EDPL) of 1978. New York State Department of Transportation operates on full compliance with EDPL but derives specific authority to acquire property for new or reconstructed highways under Section 30 of the state's highway law. Prior to acquisition an opportunity for a public hearing of the proposed project and its impact must be provided. After the hearing, the engineering division prepares detailed construction plans and appropriation maps for each property affected by the project. The property owner may accept the full payment of damages or an advance payment and claim again within three years. Special attention is given to the displacement of residential and nonresidential occupants. Relocation benefits are also available for commercial occupants. Details of residential and commercial assistance are discussed.

Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. This paper appeared in Transportation Research Special Report No. 192, Relocation and Real Property Acquisition.

00335312

pp 38-39

1981

Transportation Research Board Special Report

Relocation and Real Property Acquisition. Proceedings of a Conference

Digital/other

Businesses; Eminent domain; Laws; Loss and damage; Maps; Property acquisition; Public hearings; Relocation assistance; Residents; Road construction

New York (State)

Economics; Highways; Law; Society; I10: Economics and Administration

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Aug 15 1981 12:00AM

• ATTITUDES AND EXPERIENCES OF RELOCATED HOUSEHOLD HEADS: A CAUSAL ANALYSIS
• ATTITUDES, OPINIONS, AND EXPERIENCES OF RELOCATEES IN TEXAS DISPLACED BY HIGHWAYS UNDER THE 1970 RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
• CONDEMNATION BLIGHT
• CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND HIGHLIGHTS
• ELIGIBILITY FOR RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
• IMPACT OF RELOCATION ON PEOPLE, BUSINESSES, AND COMMUNITIES
• PROBLEMS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE UNIFORM RELOCATION ACT
• PROCESSES FOR GREATER UNIFORMITY
• PROPERTY ACQUISITION
• PROPOSED REVISIONS IN THE UNIFORM RELOCATION ACT
• RELOCATION AND PROPERTY ACQUISITION: EXPERIENCE, PROBLEMS, AND PROSPECTS
• RELOCATION AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION IMPLEMENTATION BY COUNTIES
• RELOCATION ASSISTANCE IN NEW JERSEY
• RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
• RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM IN OKLAHOMA
• RELOCATION ISSUES OF CONCERN TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
• RELOCATION NEEDS AS SEEN BY PORTSMOUTH HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
• RELOCATION OF RESIDENTS DISPLACED BY CONSTRUCTION OF I-205 IN WASHINGTON
• RELOCATION PAYMENTS AND SERVICES
• RELOCATION RESEARCH IN VIRGINIA
• RESIDENTIAL RELOCATION: IMPACT OF ALLOWANCES AND PROCEDURES IN OHIO
• SCOPE OF GSA ACQUISITION AND RELOCATION PROGRAM
• STATE PERSPECTIVE OF PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
• UNIFORM RELOCATION POLICIES IN THE 1980S
• WHAT'S WRONG WITH THE UNIFORM ACT?