01629971

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2666-11

The financing and implementation of transportation projects are more likely to be successful with the support of local communities. Hence, for cities and transportation agencies to develop strategies that will improve public acceptability and reduce resistance to funding transportation projects, it is important to understand differences in the levels of local support. This study used a factor-cluster analysis to segment a university population, to understand current levels of support toward transportation investments, and seek out important allies to endorse public and active transportation projects. The results of the study reveal five clusters of individuals with varying opinions toward transportation investments and distinct motivations. Strong advocates are the greatest allies for promoting public and active transportation investments. They support financing public and active transportation projects, and are well positioned to endorse the necessity and advantages of such investments. Highway and transit funders are motivated by their dissatisfaction with the current transportation system. Cycling advocates are valuable in publicizing the benefits of expanding the bicycle network. Infrequent commuters do not travel to the university as often as the other groups, and are supportive of transportation investments in general. Despite the overall positive opinion toward investing in public and active transportation projects, there is a minority of funding opponents who are generally against financing transportation projects. The results of this study will be helpful for policy makers intending to communicate the benefits of transportation projects to various community groups.

01648400

17-00988

English

pp 94–102

2017

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309441926

Digital/other

Figures (3) ; References (34) ; Tables (2)

Bicycling; Cluster analysis; Commuters; Financing; Investments; Nonmotorized transportation; Public opinion; Public transit; Universities and colleges

Finance; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 8 2016 10:16AM

• Analysis of Car Type Preferences Among Students Based on Seemingly Unrelated Regression
• Analysis of the Impact of Technology Use on Multimodality and Activity Travel Characteristics
• Built Environment and Walking to School: Findings from a Student Travel Behavior Survey in Massachusetts
• Changing Influence of Factors Explaining Household Car Ownership Levels in the Netherlands
• Digital Narratives of Place: Learning About Neighborhood Sense of Place and Travel Through Online Responses
• Exploring Daily Rhythms of Interpersonal Contacts: Time-of-Day Dynamics of Human Interactions with Latent Class Cluster Analysis
• Exploring the Role of Social Media Platforms in Informing Trip Planning: Case of Yelp.com
• Impacts of Telecommuting on Nonmandatory Activity Participation: Role of Endogeneity
• Inferring Activities from Social Media Data
• Modeling Week Activity Schedules for Travel Demand Models
• Personalization of Routing Services: User Classification as a Method to Overcome the Cold Start Problem for Personalized Models