01590396

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2539-17

Responsible bus accidents—accidents in which an operator’s actions largely explain why an accident occurred—decrease service reliability and safety, cause property damage, and lead to injury or even death. These effects make the reduction of avoidable accidents a high priority for transit authorities. This study used innovative techniques to identify factors that affected the probability of a responsible bus accident in the Minneapolis–Saint Paul, Minnesota, metropolitan area. The study examined data on the trip level and used the random forest model to identify the factors that most strongly affected the likelihood of an accident. In addition, this study used the partial dependency function of the random forest model as an aid in identifying nonlinear relationships between predictor and response variables. This function informs variable transformation in a traditional logistic model, which accurately classifies test set trips as accidents and nonaccidents at a rate of about 72%. Many results fell in line with past literature, but new insights were gained. Specifically, in keeping with most past studies, accidents were more likely when the bus operator was older, female, fatigued, inexperienced, driving a larger bus, or driving on a dense urban route. One new insight of this study is that bus drivers are at greater risk toward the middle of their shift, especially when traffic is dense. Bus drivers’ risk greatly increases if they (a) did not work the previous day and (b) worked longer hours the previous week. Because previous studies have not examined accidents on the trip level, they have not found these more specific work-hour relationships that capture elements of alertness, fatigue, and complacency.

01615183

16-3900

English

pp 149–158

2016

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309441216

Print

Figures (8) ; References (30) ; Tables (3)

Bus crashes; Crash causes; Crash characteristics; Hours of labor; Risk assessment; Travel; Urban areas

Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (Minnesota)

Public Transportation; Safety and Human Factors; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 12 2016 5:42PM

• Application of Bus-Only Lanes in Downtown Washington, D.C.: Concurrent Versus Contraflow Bus Lanes
• Comparison of Well-to-Wheel Efficiencies for Different Drivetrain Configurations of Transit Buses
• Creating a Bus Rapid Transit Boulevard: Making Woodhaven Boulevard Select Bus Service Work for Transit, Traffic, and the Public in Queens, New York
• Determining Optimal Strategies for Single-Line Bus Operation by Means of Smartphone Demand Data
• Estimation of Short-Term Bus Travel Time by Using Low-Resolution Automated Vehicle Location Data
• Evaluation of GPS-Based Transit Signal Priority for Mixed-Traffic Bus Rapid Transit
• Impact on Bus Ridership from Changes in a Route’s Span of Service
• Increasing the Speed: Case Study from Santiago, Chile
• Integrated Analysis System for Rural National Transit Database
• Making Headways: Analysis of Smart Cards and Bus Dwell Times in Los Angeles, California
• Modeling Fuel Consumption of Hybrid Electric Buses: Model Development and Comparison with Conventional Buses
• Optimization Model for Transit Signal Priority Under Conflicting Priority Requests
• Rubber Tires for Residents: Bus Rapid Transit and Changing Neighborhoods in Los Angeles, California
• Synchronization of Public Transport Timetabling with Multiple Vehicle Types
• Test and Evaluation of Systems to Warn Pedestrians of Turning Buses
• Trade-Offs Between Bus and Private Vehicle Delays at Signalized Intersections: Case Study of a Multiobjective Model
• Understanding and Estimating In-Service Axle Weights of Transit Buses
• Use of Real-Time Operational Tactics to Synchronize Transfers in Headway-Based Public Transport Service
• Using High-Resolution Bus GPS Data to Visualize and Identify Congestion Hot Spots in Urban Arterials