01590262

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2601-06

A meta-analysis was conducted to study the effect of a change in the speed limit on mean driving speed and safety on interurban roads. Information from 108 research results—documented in a database collected by Elvik et al. in 2004—was analyzed. The link between accident ratio (after–before) and the mean driving speed ratio was studied by estimating the power parameter in the Nilsson power model. A modified power model was applied to estimate the link between speed limit (rather than mean driving speed) ratio and accidents ratio. When the speed limit was raised, the mean driving speed ratio (mean driving speed after to mean driving speed before) was on average 1.04 (SD = 0.04), significantly higher than 1 but smaller than the speed limit ratio (average = 1.17; SD = 0.05). The power parameters in Nilsson’s power model and in its modified version were 3.73 (SD = 2.61) and 0.99 (SD = 0.46), respectively. When speed limit was reduced, the mean driving speed ratio was 0.93 (SD = 0.04), significantly smaller than 1 but larger than the speed limit ratio (average = 0.82; SD = 0.04). The corresponding power parameters were 2.81 (SD = 0.65) and 1.24 (SD = 0.44). This paper summarizes research on the link between changes in speed limit, driving speed, and safety. It was found that the average speed changed in the same direction as the speed limit, but the magnitude of the change was smaller. As a result, the power parameters in the second version of the power model were lower than those in the original Nilsson’s model, and so the average change in safety is nearly proportional to the change in speed limit.

01624778

16-3659

English

pp 42–49

2016

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309441407

Print

Figures (3) ; References (14) ; Tables (6)

Highway safety; Intercity transportation; Mathematical models; Speed limits; Urban highways

Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Safety and Human Factors

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 12 2016 5:36PM

• Application of the Location–Movement Classification Method for Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Typing
• Applications of Generalized Additive and Bayesian Hierarchical Models for Areal Safety Analysis: Case Study of an Urban Multimodal Transportation System in Chicago, Illinois
• Bayesian Latent Class Safety Performance Function for Identifying Motor Vehicle Crash Black Spots
• Before–After Safety Evaluation Using Full Bayesian Macroscopic Multivariate and Spatial Models
• Cohort-Based Analysis Structure for Modeling Driver Behavior with an In-Vehicle Data Recorder
• Comprehensive Analysis of Wrong-Way Driving Crashes on Alabama Interstates
• Comprehensive Injury Severity Analysis of SUV and Pickup Truck Rollover Crashes: Alabama Case Study
• Comprehensive Safety Diagnosis Using Automated Video Analysis: Applications to an Urban Intersection in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
• Factors Affecting Hospital Length of Stay for Drivers with Traumatic Brain Injuries from Motor Vehicle Crashes: South Carolina Case Study
• Geographical Boundary Dependency Versus Roadway Hierarchy in Macroscopic Safety Modeling: Analysis with Motor Vehicle Crash Data
• Introducing Latent Psychological Constructs in Injury Severity Modeling: Multivehicle and Multioccupant Approach
• Investigating the Heterogeneity of Postencroachment Time Thresholds Determined by Peak over Threshold Approach
• Investigating the Speed and Rear-End Collision Relationship at Urban Signalized Intersections
• Joint Modeling of Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes: Copula-Based Approach
• Model-Based Versus Data-Driven Approach for Road Safety Analysis: Do More Data Help?