01555212

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2504-04

Over the past few decades, state transportation agencies (STAs) have outsourced various functional activities traditionally performed by in-house personnel in reaction to increasing workloads and diminishing staff. To cope with the situation, STAs have developed and implemented various tools and practices for management and oversight of construction engineering and inspection (CEI) services. A national CEI survey was conducted to provide detailed mapping of various tools and practices used for CEI services and to understand the primary advantages and disadvantages of using CEI consultants. The survey found that STAs used a wide variety of tools and practices to define the scope of work for CEI services, select consultants, and administer CEI consultant contracts. Statistical analyses of variance estimated that CEI consultant management and oversight practices varied significantly; this finding may imply multiple underlying factors in the choice of one practice over another. One of the most important findings of this survey was the value of CEI consultant services to STAs. The survey found that the CEI consultant services provided STAs with an improved ability to handle peak workloads, the flexibility of quickly adding or reducing staff, and specialized expertise that might not be available in house. However, the reported challenges of working with CEI consultants included developing and maintaining consultants’ familiarity with in-house processes and procedures, ensuring that consultants held appropriate CEI qualifications, and the relative cost of CEI consultants versus in-house staff.

01582852

15-1350

English

pp 28–38

2015

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309369176

Print

Figures (12) ; References (23) ; Tables (1)

Analysis of variance; Business practices; Construction engineering; Consultants; Inspection; Oversight; State departments of transportation

Administration and Management; Construction; Highways; Maintenance and Preservation; I10: Economics and Administration; I50: Construction and Supervision of Construction; I60: Maintenance

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 30 2014 12:31PM

• Application of Work Zone Road User Costs to Determine Schedule-Related Incentives and Disincentives: Conceptual Framework
• Comparison of Density Tests for Thin Hot-Mix Asphalt Overlays
• Concepts to Enhance Specification and Inspection of Curing Effectiveness in Concrete Pavement Design and Construction
• Cost and Schedule Performance Benchmarks of U.S. Transportation Public–Private Partnership Projects: Preliminary Results
• Determinants of Variability in Preliminary Engineering Funding: Program-Level Analysis
• Economic Haul Radius as Affected by Diesel Fuel Cost
• Laboratory Evaluation and Field Construction of Roller-Compacted Concrete for Testing Under Accelerated Loading
• Models of Asphalt Concrete Field Compactibility with Focus on Lift Thickness
• Performance-Based Warranty Contracts for Pavement Markings: Experience and Lessons Learned in the State of Utah
• Policies and Procedures for Successful Implementation of Alternative Technical Concepts
• Relationship Between Early Contractor Involvement and Financial Performance in the Rebuilding of Infrastructure in Christchurch, New Zealand
• Relationship Between Surface Profile Characteristics and the Need for Localized Roughness Correction: Investigation Based on Bump Rating Panel Data
• Structural Health Monitoring System for Ironton–Russell Bridge, Ohio and Kentucky: Phase 1. Substructure Construction
• Submittal and Evaluation Procedures for Alternative Technical Concepts
• Testing of Dowel Alignment and Development of a Dowel Bar Alignment Specification for Illinois Tollways
• Trends in Quality Management Approaches to Design–Build Transportation Projects
• U.S. Partnering Programs and International Partnering Contracts and Alliances: Comparative Analysis