01518433

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2393-10

http://scholar.google.com...berg&publication_year=2013

Reallocating road space to enhance bicycle and pedestrian access is frequently a contentious issue in many American cities. This resistance to the redesign was characteristic in Eugene, Oregon, where a key street segment adjacent to a pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly university was retrofitted to accommodate nonmotorized vehicles better. The intention was to expand pedestrian and bicycle access, so a bicycle lane was actually removed in one direction in favor of implementing a shared lane, and physical barriers between an existing contraflow bicycle lane and a one-way automobile traffic lane were also removed. In addition, two-sided parallel parking stalls were replaced with single-sided, back-in angle parking stalls (a first for Eugene), and sidewalks were widened to better accommodate high pedestrian volumes. Video footage to record behavior along this block before and after the redesign was used to study traffic volume changes by mode and changes in behavior. The results demonstrated that bicycle volumes increased, pedestrian crossing volumes increased, and vehicular traffic volumes showed little change after the redesign. The integration of bicycle and vehicular traffic lanes and removal of physical barriers improved safety for nonmotorized vehicles because the rate of traffic conflicts remained low, no collisions occurred, and the redesign provided new ways for convenient navigation around blockages. Despite a perceived increase in chaos, given increased nonmotorized traffic volumes, this block became no less safe after redesign even though nonmotorized traffic volumes and adaptive use of the space greatly increased. Examination of the particular elements of this redesign provides insight into ways that other multimodal traffic streams could be improved.

01518276

13-2900

English

0000-0002-7698-4814

pp 85-94

2013

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309287173

Print

Figures; Photos; References; Tables

Before and after studies; Bicycle facilities; Highway design; Pedestrian areas; Through traffic; Traffic volume; Urban design

Eugene (Oregon)

Design; Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; I20: Design and Planning of Transport Infrastructure

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Mar 18 2014 1:13PM

• Analysis of Pedestrian Performance in Shared-Space Environments
• Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Traffic Conflicts in Street Designs with Elements of Shared Space
• Application of Computer Vision to Diagnosis of Pedestrian Safety Issues
• Considerations for Integrating Bicycling and Walking Facilities into Urban Infrastructure
• Development of Canadian National Pedestrian Crossing Control Guide
• Do All Roadway Users Want the Same Things? Results from Roadway Design Survey of San Francisco Bay Area Pedestrians, Drivers, Bicyclists, and Transit Users
• Do Complete Streets Cost More Than Incomplete Streets?
• Effect of Advance Yield Markings and Symbolic Signs on Vehicle–Pedestrian Conflicts: Field Evaluation
• Effect of Left-Turn Operational Mode on Pedestrian Safety: Development of Models and Guidelines
• Effectiveness of Audible and Tactile Heading Cues at Complex Intersections for Pedestrians Who Are Blind
• Effects of High-Visibility Enforcement on Driver Compliance with Pedestrian Yield Right-of-Way Laws
• Evaluation of Pedestrian Safety: Pedestrian Crash Hot Spots and Risk Factors for Injury Severity
• Feature Analysis and Operation Evaluation of Pedestrian Weaving Zone
• Missing Links: How Social Paths Can Improve Pedestrian Accessibility to Light Rail
• Pedestrian Crash Risk on Boundary Roadways: University Campus Case Study
• Sight Distance for Disabled Pedestrians at Crossings: Methodology Comparison with Other Modes
• Study on Pedestrian Red-Time Crossing Behavior: Integrated Field Observation and Questionnaire Data
• Use of Spatiotemporal Parameters of Gait for Automated Classification of Pedestrian Gender and Age
• Using a Smartphone Application to Support Visually Impaired Pedestrians at Signalized Intersection Crossings