TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Special Assessment District’s Ability to Fund Transit: Lessons from Project-Level Analysis

Accession Number:

01519845

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States
Order URL: http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/171801.aspx

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/9780309295277

Abstract:

This paper reviews four transit projects funded by using special assessment districts (SADs) across the United States. The paper examines the SAD revenue yield and stability and focuses on the actions taken by public agencies to enhance them; this examination results in three important findings. First, SAD revenues are highly stable and can be expected to generate large sums of money. However, as a proportion of project cost, such revenues might fund a small portion of capital-intensive transit projects such as heavy rail. Second, SAD revenues typically do not accrue up front because property owners have the option to pay the fee over time. Therefore, public agencies must rely on other funding sources (usually assessment fee–backed bonds) to address this revenue–expenditure mismatch. Finally, to ensure that assessment revenues do not decline in real dollars when paid over time, public agencies charge property owners interest, usually on the basis of the interest paid to service the assessment-backed bonds. Public agencies can take the following steps to enhance SADs’ revenue yield and stability. First, try to capture as large a portion of the property value increase as is politically feasible. Second, use SADs to demonstrate local community support for a transit project, thereby leveraging state and federal funds. Third, minimize the number of properties exempt from paying assessments. Fourth, minimize real estate market risks to SAD revenues by formulating a revenue calculation methodology based on factors other than or in addition to property value, such as a parcel’s street frontage and size and a property’s building area. In addition, the assessment fee could be a proportion of the property’s previously assessed value or a proportion of a fixed property value increment. Fifth, ensure full payment of fees.

Monograph Title:

Transit 2014, Volume 3

Monograph Accession #:

01547892

Report/Paper Numbers:

14-4302

Language:

English

Authors:

Mathur, Shishir

ORCID 0000-0003-4601-7636

Pagination:

pp 103–110

Publication Date:

2014

Serial:

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Issue Number: 2417
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

9780309295277

Media Type:

Print

Features:

References (39) ; Tables (3)

Uncontrolled Terms:

Geographic Terms:

Subject Areas:

Administration and Management; Finance; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I10: Economics and Administration

Files:

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Created Date:

Jan 27 2014 3:29PM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: