01515607

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2464-10

With increasing energy costs as well as rampant congestion in major U.S. cities, the popularity of walk and bike mode choices has increased in recent years. NHTSA has estimated that, in 2011, 11.1% of pedestrian fatalities and 18.5% of bicyclist fatalities in the United States occurred in Florida, although the state accounted for just 6.1% of the nation’s population. In addition, intersections are hot spots for vehicle–pedestrian conflicts. This finding has been confirmed by FHWA’s estimate that in the United States nearly one in five pedestrian fatalities occurs at an intersection. Because signalized and nonsignalized intersections are conflict points for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists, traffic control methods to ensure that safety is not compromised are essential. For the examination of the safety effects of walk modes at signalized intersections, four locations in the Tampa Bay area were chosen. Two of the locations operated with rest in walk and pedestrian recall, and the other two operated without rest in walk and pedestrian recall. The study collected a total of 26 h of data in early 2013 at the four study sites, with a yield of 202 pedestrian and bicyclist observations. The behaviors were modeled with a multinomial logit model. The modeling found that the presence of rest in walk and pedestrian recall on minor street pedestrian phases, which operated concurrently with major street vehicle phases, encouraged higher pedestrian and bicyclist compliance rates. The presence or absence of the combination of rest in walk and pedestrian recall was found to be the most influential variable examined.

01557586

14-3897

English

pp 77–85

2014

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309295567

Print

Figures (3) ; References (19) ; Tables (6)

Cyclists; Highway safety; Multinomial logits; Pedestrian vehicle crashes; Pedestrians; Signalized intersections; Traffic signal phases; Traffic signal timing; Travel behavior

Tampa (Florida)

Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Safety and Human Factors; I73: Traffic Control; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 27 2014 3:20PM

• Assessing the Safety Benefit of Advanced Vehicular Technology for Protecting Pedestrians: Pedestrian Protection Airbags
• Closed-Course Study of Driver Detection of Pedestrians Beyond Flashing Beacons Within Sign Assembly
• Development of Low-Cost Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian Safety in Support of Complete Streets Policy Implementation
• Driver Approach Speed and Its Impact on Driver Yielding to Pedestrian Behavior at Unsignalized Crosswalks
• Evaluating Driver and Pedestrian Behaviors at Enhanced, Multilane, Midblock Pedestrian Crossings: Case Study in Portland, Oregon
• Examining Long-Term Impact of California Safe Routes to School Program: Ten Years Later
• Far-Side Audible Beaconing of Accessible Pedestrian Signals: Is It Confusing?
• Impact of Intersection Design on Pedestrians’ Choice to Cross on Red
• Impacts of Alternative Yield Sign Placement on Pedestrian Safety
• Mitigation of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts at Stop-Controlled T-Intersections
• Pedestrian Safety Initiative in Montgomery County, Maryland: Data-Driven Approach to Coordinating Engineering, Education, and Enforcement
• Perception-Based Walkability Index to Test Impact of Microlevel Walkability on Sustainable Mode Choice Decisions
• Planning-Level Model for Assessing Pedestrian Safety
• Safety Performance Study of Shared Pedestrian and Vehicle Space in New Zealand
• Walkability Indicators for Pedestrian-Friendly Design
• Walking Behaviors by Trip Purposes
• Walking for Purpose and Pleasure: Influences of Light Rail, Built Environment, and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Travel