01516344

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2459-15

Both Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, and New York City have experienced catastrophic weather events in recent years. In January 2011, the Brisbane River flooded, inundating more than 20,000 houses; in October 2012, superstorm Hurricane Sandy hit New York City and produced a major storm surge that flooded much of the city. Ferry systems in both cities were badly affected. Comparative research was used to explore how each city’s ferry operators and managers addressed the impacts before, during, and after those events. A review of published materials related to the two systems during and after the disasters was supplemented by interviews with key agency personnel in each city, conducted in mid-2013. Results suggest that how ferries are affected by floods and other disasters and how ferries may be used to rapidly respond to and provide for postflood transport needs depend entirely on context. The linear river ferry operations of Brisbane suffered much terminal damage, and operations were unable to recommence service as a result of debris and the swollen nature of the river for many weeks after the flood. In contrast, within 2 days, New York City ferries were reintroduced on key routes and were introduced to new emergency locations to provide mobility for citizens who were unable to use other transport modes because of storm damage. The lessons learned by the operators include essential areas that authorities must address before a disaster: infrastructure design and resilience, disaster planning, insurance and legal requirements, staff management, and coordination during the reconstruction phase. Findings suggest that authorities can significantly reduce damage and improve recovery times if they plan and prepare for such events well ahead of time.

01551909

14-2436

English

pp 127–132

2014

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309295512

Print

Figures (3) ; Maps; Photos; References (21) ; Tables (1)

Disaster preparedness; Disasters and emergency operations; Ferries; Floods; Literature reviews; Operators (Persons)

Brisbane (Australia); New York (New York)

Marine Transportation; Operations and Traffic Management; Security and Emergencies; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning; I82: Accidents and Transport Infrastructure

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 27 2014 2:51PM

• Accessibility of Low-Income Populations to Safe Zones During Localized Evacuations
• Cost Assessment of Highway Bridge Network Subjected to Extreme Seismic Events
• Effect of Phased Evacuations in Megaregion Highway Networks
• Efficient Negative Cycle–Canceling Algorithm for Finding the Optimal Traffic Routing for Network Evacuation with Nonuniform Threats
• Generic Incident Model for Investigating Traffic Incident Impacts on Evacuation Times in Large-Scale Emergencies
• Indicator Approach for Assessing Climate Change Vulnerability in Transportation Infrastructure
• Mathematical Modeling of Command-and-Control Strategies in Crowd Movement
• Mobility Benefits of Intermediate Crossovers on Contraflow Facilities During Hurricane Evacuation
• Modeling and Assessment of Crossing Elimination for No-Notice Evacuations
• Network Flow Solution Method for Optimal Evacuation Traffic Routing and Signal Control with Nonuniform Threat
• Planning Postdisaster Operations in a Highway Network: Network Design Model with Interdependencies
• Simulation Study of Evacuation Routes and Traffic Management Strategies in Short-Notice Emergency Evacuation
• Use of Mobile Lidar Data to Assess Hurricane Damage and Visualize Community Vulnerability
• Use of Social Media Data to Explore Crisis Informatics: Study of 2013 Oklahoma Tornado