01515221

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2464-17

Research has demonstrated that accessible pedestrian signals (APS) with push button–integrated speakers increase push-button use and increase the likelihood of starting to cross during the walk interval by pedestrians who are blind. However, consistently positive effects on locating the crosswalk or establishing or maintaining an accurate heading for crossing have not been found. Attempts have recently been made to configure APS to provide better audible information for these wayfinding tasks. A configuration that has been shown to improve heading accuracy provides audible tones from a speaker at the destination corner before the walk interval (to assist with establishing heading) and during the flashing "Don’t Walk" interval (to assist with maintaining heading). Major concerns are that beaconing information may be ambiguous or misleading and result in dangerous crossing behavior at intersections where buildings create echoes of audible signal information and where beacons for multiple crosswalks might be active simultaneously. This study evaluated the effects of a beaconing APS system on pedestrian crossing behavior at an acoustically complex intersection and with multiple beacons sometimes concurrently active. Eighteen participants who were totally blind attempted a total of 216 crossings under three conditions. The results revealed no evidence that participants were distracted or were misled by concurrent beaconing information coming from a corner other than the target destination. Moreover, despite an acoustically complex environment, the beacon led to improved wayfinding performance in some conditions and showed no evidence of having any deleterious effects.

01557586

14-1120

English

pp 135–143

2014

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309295567

Print

Figures (4) ; References (22)

Accessibility; Audible pedestrian signals; Blind persons; Flashing beacons; Pedestrian actuated controllers; Pedestrian movement; Wayfinding

Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Safety and Human Factors; I85: Safety Devices used in Transport Infrastructure

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 27 2014 2:26PM

• Assessing the Safety Benefit of Advanced Vehicular Technology for Protecting Pedestrians: Pedestrian Protection Airbags
• Closed-Course Study of Driver Detection of Pedestrians Beyond Flashing Beacons Within Sign Assembly
• Development of Low-Cost Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian Safety in Support of Complete Streets Policy Implementation
• Driver Approach Speed and Its Impact on Driver Yielding to Pedestrian Behavior at Unsignalized Crosswalks
• Evaluating Driver and Pedestrian Behaviors at Enhanced, Multilane, Midblock Pedestrian Crossings: Case Study in Portland, Oregon
• Examining Long-Term Impact of California Safe Routes to School Program: Ten Years Later
• Impact of Intersection Design on Pedestrians’ Choice to Cross on Red
• Impacts of Alternative Yield Sign Placement on Pedestrian Safety
• Mitigation of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts at Stop-Controlled T-Intersections
• Pedestrian Safety Initiative in Montgomery County, Maryland: Data-Driven Approach to Coordinating Engineering, Education, and Enforcement
• Perception-Based Walkability Index to Test Impact of Microlevel Walkability on Sustainable Mode Choice Decisions
• Planning-Level Model for Assessing Pedestrian Safety
• Safety Performance Study of Shared Pedestrian and Vehicle Space in New Zealand
• Understanding Pedestrian and Bicyclist Compliance and Safety Impacts of Walk Modes at Signalized Intersections for a Livable Community
• Walkability Indicators for Pedestrian-Friendly Design
• Walking Behaviors by Trip Purposes
• Walking for Purpose and Pleasure: Influences of Light Rail, Built Environment, and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Travel