01476685

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2377-06

http://scholar.google.com...+Kim&publication_year=2013

Mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining walls are used to provide roadway elevation for bridge approaches, underpass frontage roads, and other roadway elevation applications. Vehicular traffic may exist on the high (fill) side of the MSE retaining wall, the low side, or both sides. For traffic on the high side, a conventional traffic barrier might be placed on or near the top of the wall and mounted on a moment slab or a bridge deck. For traffic on the low side, a conventional traffic barrier might be installed adjacent to the wall or the wall itself may serve as the traffic barrier. Typical MSE wall panels are not designed to resist vehicle impacts. Therefore, structural damage to the wall panels and the earth fill would require complicated and expensive repairs. A simple reinforced-concrete crash wall constructed in front of the MSE wall panels could significantly reduce damage to the panels. It might prove practical to implement such a design to reduce costly repairs to the MSE wall structure. In this paper, LS-DYNA finite element analysis code was used to model and analyze a sacrificial crash wall design to determine its effectiveness in protecting an MSE retaining wall. Based on the LS-DYNA simulations, a crash wall that is 8 in. (0.2 m) thick is considered to be an adequate design to reduce damage to the MSE wall.

01503755

13-5263

English

pp 49-60

2013

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309286961

Print

Figures (11) ; Photos; References (14) ; Tables (1)

Bridge approaches; Crashworthiness; Finite element method; Frontage roads; Mechanically stabilized earth; Reinforced concrete retaining walls; Underpasses; Walls

Bridges and other structures; Design; Geotechnology; Highways; Safety and Human Factors; I24: Design of Bridges and Retaining Walls; I53: Construction of Bridges and Retaining Walls; I85: Safety Devices used in Transport Infrastructure

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 5 2013 1:00PM

• Characterization of Opposite-Direction Road Departure Crashes in the United States
• Dynamic Evaluation and Implementation Guidelines for a Nonproprietary W-Beam Guardrail Trailing-End Terminal
• Injury Risk Posed by Side Impact of Nontracking Vehicles into Guardrails
• Midwest Guardrail System Without Blockouts
• Motorcyclist Impacts into Roadside Barriers: Is the European Crash Test Standard Comprehensive Enough?
• Retrofit Bridge Rail Design and Testing for a Historic Texas Steel Truss Bridge
• Some Limitations of the Models in the Highway Safety Manual to Predict Run-off-Road Crashes
• Test Level 2 Guardrail-to-Bridge Rail Transition Compatible with 31-in. Guardrail