01473900

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2387-15

http://scholar.google.com...Neil&publication_year=2013

The labeling and the categorizing of cyclists have been occurring for more than a century for a variety of purposes. This study examined a typology developed by the City of Portland, Oregon, that included four categories of cyclists: "the strong and the fearless," "the enthused and confident," "the interested but concerned," and "no way, no how." Unlike several other typologies, this widely referenced typology was intended to apply to all adults, regardless of their current cycling behavior. An analysis was conducted with data from a random phone survey (n = 908) of adults in the Portland region. Adults were placed into one of the four categories primarily on the basis of their stated comfort level with cycling on a variety of facility types, their interest in cycling as transportation, and their physical ability to bicycle. Nearly all of the sampled population fit clearly into one of the four categories. A majority (56%) of the region’s population fit in the interested but concerned category, which was thought to be the key target market to increase the use of cycling as a form of transportation. The analysis indicated that a reduction in traffic speed and an increase in the separation between bicycles and motor vehicles (e.g., cycle tracks) might increase levels of comfort and cycling rates. Women and older adults were underrepresented among the more confident adults and those who currently cycled for transportation.

01514640

13-5213

English

pp 129–138

2013

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309287067

Print

Figures (2) ; References (34) ; Tables (6)

Bicycle travel; Bicycling; Cyclists; Travel behavior

Typology

Portland (Oregon)

Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Planning and Forecasting; Society; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 5 2013 12:59PM

• Are Bikeshare Users Different from Regular Cyclists? A First Look at Short-Term Users, Annual Members, and Area Cyclists in the Washington, D.C., Region
• Assessment of Three Alternative Bicycle Infrastructure Quality-of-Service Metrics
• Bicycle-Specific Traffic Signals: Results from a State-of-the-Practice Review
• Built Environment and Household Electric Bike Ownership: Insights from Zhongshan Metropolitan Area, China
• Characteristics of Multimodal Conflicts in Urban On-Street Bicycle Lanes
• Commuter Cyclist Travel Behavior: Examination of the Impact of Changes in Weather
• Computer Vision Techniques for the Automated Collection of Cyclist Data
• Development of Surface Roughness Standards for Pathways Used by Wheelchairs
• Evaluation of Innovative Bicycle Facilities in Washington, D.C.: Pennsylvania Avenue Median Lanes and 15th Street Cycle Track
• Is Evidence in Practice? Review of Driver and Cyclist Education Materials with Respect to Cycling Safety Evidence
• Methodology for Estimating Bicyclist Acceleration and Speed Distributions at Intersections
• Modeling of Passing Events in Mixed Bicycle Traffic with Cellular Automata
• North America’s First E-Bikeshare: A Year of Experience
• Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator Understanding and Emerging Trends
• Role of the Bicycle in the Limitation of Transport Poverty in the Netherlands
• Station-Level Forecasting of Bikesharing Ridership: Station Network Effects in Three U.S. Systems