01475202

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2337-10

http://scholar.google.com...cher&publication_year=2013

The Florida Department of Transportation has historically used a combination of handheld devices and visual surveys to evaluate the retroreflectivity of pavement markings. However, visual surveys have the inherent limitations of operator bias, while the use of a handheld device is slow and labor intensive and presents safety hazards. Many highway agencies have recognized that a mobile retroreflectivity unit (MRU) may be a safer and more efficient alternative to the handheld retroreflectometers. Because the measurement process relies on the operator-driven instrument, a level of uncertainty is always a concern in evaluating pavement markings with the MRU. This research was aimed at assessing the precision and bias of the MRU while using the handheld retroreflectometer as a reference device. Ten 1.0-mi-long field sites were selected to include various pavement surface types and pavement marking materials (paints and thermoplastics). The results indicated that, when compared with the handheld retroreflectometers, the MRU demonstrated no statistical differences or bias at a 95% confidence level for the retroreflectivity values ranging between 200 and 800 mcd/m2/lux. In addition, it was determined that the retroreflectivity values from two properly conducted tests using a single MRU on the same pavement marking should not differ by more than 7.8%, and when different MRUs were used on the same pavement marking, the retroreflectivity values should not differ by more than 13.3%. This paper presents a description of the testing program, the data collection effort, and the subsequent analyses and findings.

01501139

13-3812

English

pp 74–82

2013

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309286930

Print

Figures (11) ; References (12) ; Tables (1)

Field tests; Measurement; Measuring instruments; Portable equipment; Retroreflection; Retroreflectivity; Road markings

Florida

Highways; Maintenance and Preservation; Materials; Pavements; I30: Materials; I60: Maintenance

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 5 2013 12:44PM

• Analysis of Sign Damage and Failure: Utah Case Study
• Assessment of Durability of Wet Night Visible Pavement Markings: Visibility Experiment
• Evaluation of Temporary Ramp Metering for Work Zones
• Field Evaluation of Automated Flagger Assistance Devices in Work Zones on Two-Lane Roads
• Flagger Effects in Reducing the Likelihood of Rear-End Collisions for In-Platoon Vehicles in Work Zones
• Formalized Process for Performance Assessment of Work Zone Transportation Management Plans in Virginia
• Injury Outcomes and Costs for Work Zone Crashes
• Investigation of Longitudinal Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity and Safety
• Motorists’ Understanding of Automated Flagger Assistance Devices in Work Zones
• Work Zone Lighting and Visual Performance: Analysis and Demonstration