01476432

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2351-01

http://scholar.google.com...abis&publication_year=2013

State and local transit agencies require government support to preserve their aging transit fleets. With the passage of time, transit fleets get older and require maintenance costs to keep them operational. To provide services at a desired level, transit agencies must maintain a minimum fleet size. Two imperative considerations from the transit planning viewpoint are (a) the remaining life of the total fleet and (b) the cost required to maintain the fleet size. While the former is a quality measure indicating the health of the fleet, the latter is an economic measure requiring minimum expenditure levels. Ideally, agencies would like to maximize the total remaining life of the fleet and minimize the total cost required to maintain the fleet size. In this paper, a multiobjective optimization (MO) model is proposed to incorporate simultaneously the two objectives when subjected to budget and various operational constraints. The MO problem is solved with a classical weight sum approach by using the branch and bound algorithm, which has proved to be better than other solution methodologies. The MO results in Pareto-optimal solutions with possible trade-offs between the two objectives. The model is applied to a large-scale transit fleet system in the state of Michigan. The case study results demonstrate that the proposed model is compact, efficient, robust, and suitable for long-range planning with multiple solutions to choose from a Pareto-optimal frontier. The correlation between decision variables and objective functions has been investigated in-depth, providing important insights. The proposed model can act as a tool for resource allocation for state and local agency transit fleets.

01517273

13-2225

English

pp 1–13

2013

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309286992

Print

Figures (4) ; References (39) ; Tables (5)

Branch and bound algorithms; Costs; Long range planning; Optimization; Resource allocation; Service life; Transit buses; Vehicle maintenance

Michigan

Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 5 2013 12:29PM

• Benchmarking Disaggregate Customer Satisfaction Scores of Bus Operators in Different Cities and Countries
• Benefits of Real-Time Transit Information and Impacts of Data Accuracy on Rider Experience
• Calibration of a Public Transport Performance Measurement System for Switzerland
• Doing Business Around Transit Corridors: Survey Research on Business Perceptions of Fixed-Guideway Transit Projects
• Dynamic System Optimal Routing in Multimodal Transit Network
• Effect of Parking Charges at Transit Stations on Park-and-Ride Mode Choice: Lessons Learned from Stated Preference Survey in Greater Vancouver, Canada
• Effects of Fare Payment Types and Crowding on Dwell Time: Fine-Grained Analysis
• High-Load Transit Line Passenger Transmission and Productiveness Efficiencies
• How Close Is Close Enough? Statistical Equivalence of Onboard Versus Online Surveys of Transit Customers
• Intraurban Rail Access: Policy Implications of Five Revealed Perspectives from a Q-Sorting Exercise in Three Australian Cities
• Large-Scale Transit Schedule Coordination Based on Journey Planner Requests
• Passenger-Focused Management Approach to Measurement of Train Delay Impacts
• Passengers’ Perception of and Behavioral Adaptation to Unreliability in Public Transportation
• Pedestrian Route Choice of Vertical Facilities in Subway Stations
• Perspectives of the Operational Performance of Public Transportation Agencies with Data Envelopment Analysis Technique
• Potential of Low-Frequency Automated Vehicle Location Data for Monitoring and Control of Bus Performance
• Unbanked Transit Riders and Open Payment Fare Collection