01475736

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2382-01

http://scholar.google.com...Lois&publication_year=2013

To develop effective cycling policies, decision makers and administrators should know the factors influencing the use of the bicycle for daily mobility. Traditional discrete choice models tend to be based on variables such as time and cost, which do not sufficiently explain the choice of the bicycle as a mode of transportation. Because psychological factors have been identified as particularly influential in the decision to commute by bicycle, this paper examines the perceptions of cycling factors and their influence on commuting by bicycle. Perceptions are measured by attitudes, other psychological variables, and habits. Statistical differences in the variables are established in relation to the choice of commuting mode and bicycle experience (commuter, sport–leisure, no use). Doing so enables the authors to identify the main barriers to commuting by bicycle and to make recommendations for cycling policies. Two underlying structures (factors) of the attitudinal variables are identified: direct benefits and long-term benefits. Three other factors are related to variables of difficulty: physical conditions, external facilities, and individual capacities. The effect of attitudes and other psychological variables on people’s decision to cycle to work–place of study is tested by using a logit model. In the case study of Madrid, Spain, the decision to cycle to work–place of study is heavily influenced by cycling habits (for noncommuting trips). Because bicycle commuting is not common, attitudes and other psychological variables play a less important role in the use of bikes.

01506861

13-0624

English

pp 1–9

2013

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309286985

Print

Figures (1) ; References (31) ; Tables (8)

Attitudes; Bicycle commuting; Logits; Policy making; Psychological aspects; Social factors

Barriers to implementation; Habits

Madrid (Spain)

Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Planning and Forecasting; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 5 2013 12:15PM

• Accommodating Immigration Status and Self-Selection Effects in a Joint Model of Household Auto Ownership and Residential Location Choice
• Accuracy of Geoimputation: An Approach to Capture Microenvironment
• Allocation of Intrahousehold Motorized Vehicles: Exploration with the 2009 National Household Travel Survey
• Are Transit Trips Symmetrical in Time and Space? Evidence from the Twin Cities
• Assessment of the Degree of Willingness to Change from Motorized Travel Modes to Walking or Cycling
• Exploring the Dynamics in Travel Time Frontiers
• Fuel Use and Optimality of Assignments in Multivehicle Households in 2001 and 2009
• Hybrid Choice Model to Investigate Effects of Teenagers’ Attitudes Toward Walking and Cycling on Mode Choice Behavior
• Incorporating Time Dynamics in Activity Travel Behavior Model: A Path Analysis of Changes in Activity and Travel Time Allocation in Response to Life-Cycle Events
• Individual Mobility Attributes and Their Impact on Modality Style: Comparison Across Three Population Sectors in Jerusalem, Israel
• Integrated Model of Residential Location, Work Location, Vehicle Ownership, and Commute Tour Characteristics
• Investigating Changes in Willingness to Pay for Managed-Lane Systems: Quasi-Panel Approach
• Linking Elderly Transport Mobility and Subjective Well-Being: A Multivariate Latent Modeling Approach
• Modeling the Connection Between Activity-Travel Patterns and Subjective Well-Being
• Revealed Willingness to Pay for Leisure: Link Between Structural and Microeconomic Models of Time Use
• Simultaneous Analysis of Global Decisions in Activity Travel Scheduling Process
• Uncertainty in Predicted Sequences of Activity Travel Episodes: Measurement and Analysis
• Within-Individual Variation in Preferences: Equity Effects of Congestion Charges