01367991

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2305-15

http://scholar.google.com...alim&publication_year=2012

A newly developed mechanistically based design procedure for airfield hot-mix asphalt pavement is studied. The pavement performance is calculated in terms of critical strains on the basis of multilayer theory. Rutting failure criteria from the Asphalt Institute, Shell Oil, and the revised U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (USACE-WES) are used to calculate the thickness requirements necessary for a range of design input variables. The program has been implemented in ZAPRAM, an event-driven, user-friendly educational computer program that runs in the Excel 2007 environment, coupled with Visual Basic programming. Results of the design comparison indicate a significant difference between the three common airfield pavement design procedures used. Differences between the Asphalt Institute procedure and the revised USACE-WES procedure are relatively moderate for all design situations. The greatest deviation is found between the Shell Oil approach and the other two criteria. The design difference depends heavily on several major factors. An analysis of heavy aircraft (B-747) operating on a low-support subgrade foundation may yield pavement design differences of 2 to 3 ft of granular subbase material. A major effort to enhance the state of the art for airfield pavement design models is recommended.

01470561

12-2983

English

pp 141–149

2012

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309263139

Print

Figures; References; Tables

Airport runways; Design methods; Flexible pavements; Hot mix asphalt; Mechanistic-empirical pavement design; Pavement design; Subbase (Pavements); Subgrade (Pavements); Thickness

Heavy aircraft

Aviation; Design; Pavements; I22: Design of Pavements, Railways and Guideways

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 8 2012 5:13PM

• Calibrating "Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide" for North Carolina: Genetic Algorithm and Generalized Reduced Gradient Optimization Methods
• Concrete Pavement Joint Diagnostics with Ultrasonic Tomography
• Development of Mechanistic–Empirical Design Procedure for Fully Permeable Pavement Under Heavy Traffic
• Establishing Effective Linear Temperature Gradients for Ultrathin Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt Pavements
• Evaluating the Effect of Concrete Slab Curling on Joint Load Transfer Responses
• Evaluation of Representative Loading Frequency for Linear Elastic Analysis of Asphalt Pavements
• Improved Mechanistic–Empirical Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement Design Approach with Modified Punchout Model
• Induction Healing of Porous Asphalt
• Joint Load Transfer and Support Considerations for Jointed Precast Concrete Pavements
• Load and Resistance Factors and Design Parameter Offsets for "Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide"
• Method for Evaluating Implications of Climate Change for Design and Performance of Flexible Pavements
• Modification of "Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide" Procedure for Two-Lift Composite Concrete Pavements
• New Warping and Differential Drying Shrinkage Models for Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements Derived with Nonlinear Shrinkage Distribution
• Rational Use of Terminal Anchorages in Portland Cement Concrete Pavement
• Reliability-Based Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design with Statistical Methods
• Streamlining Use of "Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide"
• Structural Coefficient of Open-Graded Friction Course