01366604

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2321-06

http://scholar.google.com...oyce&publication_year=2012

The interaction between motorized and nonmotorized road users has been an issue of contention for many years. Drivers complain that bicyclist behavior ranges from annoying to dangerous to illegal. Bicyclists complain that driver behavior ranges from annoying to dangerous to illegal. Many studies have observed these interactions on urban roads. However, only anecdotal evidence existed for the interactions on rural roads. When looking at driver and bicyclist behavior, specifically during interactions on rural roads, researchers have not had independent data to review. The study underlying this paper collected real-time interaction data between bicycles and motorized vehicles on rural roads, with Dane County, Wisconsin, as a field laboratory. Researchers collected video and sensor data for 1,151 interactions between bicycles and motorized vehicles. This paper provides initial observations drawn from these interactions. This study found that drivers, in fact, operated in a technically unsafe manner by frequently performing passing maneuvers outside designated areas. This study also found that despite the frequent comment from bicyclists that drivers passed too closely, these actions were actually quite rare and accounted for only 0.5% of all the observed interactions (six of 1,151). Drivers were far more likely to give bicyclists more room than required and risked a centerline violation, even when conditions were not safe to do so. Bicycle lanes (paved shoulders) directly affected the likelihood of a driver committing a moving violation, with violation rates four to six times lower when a paved shoulder was available.

01470176

12-0523

English

pp 38–45

2012

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309263160

Print

Figures; Maps; Photos; References; Tables

Behavior; Cyclists; Data collection; Drivers; Field studies; Moving violations; Passing; Rural highways; Traffic safety

Dane County (Wisconsin)

Highways; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Safety and Human Factors; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 8 2012 4:55PM

• Automatic Calibration of Behavioral Parameters for Variable Message Sign–Based Route Guidance Consistent with Driver Behavior
• Driver Performance at High Speeds Using a Simulator
• Driver Responses to Signing Treatments for Flooded Roads
• Dynamic Maximum Speed Limits: Perception, Mental Workload, and Compliance
• Effect of External Distractions: Behavior and Vehicle Control of Novice and Experienced Drivers Evaluated
• Evaluating the Impact of Processing Spoken Words on Driving: Experiments with Driving Simulator
• Investigating Differences Between Experienced Adult Drivers and Teen Drivers with Low-Cost Vehicle Data Recorder
• Naturalistic Census of Cell Phone Use
• New Measure of Inattentiveness to Forward Roadway
• Observational Survey of Cell Phone Use and Texting by California Drivers, 2011
• Outbound Texting: Comparison of Speech-Based Approach and Handheld Touch-Screen Equivalent
• Using Crash Data to Develop Simulator Scenarios for Assessing Novice Driver Performance