01336871

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2244-09

http://scholar.google.com...amer&publication_year=2011

Metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are required to undertake a federally mandated transportation planning and programming process. Although federal law mandates the process and documents that it must be adopted, the law is completely silent on how the MPO should be organized and administered. It has long been known that some MPOs operate as independent agencies, while others depend on a host agency to provide goods and services to support the MPO. Using results from a national survey of MPOs, this paper discusses the administrative structure of MPOs, including the prevalence of hosted MPOs, the types of host agencies, indirect charges, and the advantages of being hosted versus independent. The survey found that 69% of MPOs were hosted by another agency. Regional councils (26%) were the largest host of MPOs, but municipalities (20%) and counties (20%) were also commonly reported. MPOs gave narrative responses about the perceived advantages and disadvantages of their individual administrative structure. The major advantages of hosting included lower overall costs, staff synergies, and agency name recognition. The major disadvantages identified included lack of capital float, difficulty meeting federal match requirements, and confusion in managerial independence. Five distinct types of MPO organizational structures were identified, and the common attributes of each type were discussed. The paper concludes by addressing important issues MPOs must consider when choosing between a hosted MPO administrative structure and an independent one.

01359893

11-0603

English

pp 69-75

2011

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309167642

Print

Figures (2) ; Tables (3)

Administration; Management; Metropolitan planning organizations; Surveys

Organizational management; Organizational structure

Administration and Management; Transportation (General); I10: Economics and Administration

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 17 2011 5:30PM

• Assessing China’s Megaregional Mobility in a Comparative Context
• Creating Liveable Neighborhoods Through Context-Sensitive Multimodal Road Planning
• Determining Fair Share Regional Targets for Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Transportation and Land Use: California’s Experience Under Senate Bill 375
• Developing and Applying Models for Estimating Arterial Corridor Travel Time Index for Transportation Planning in Small to Medium-Sized Communities
• Identifying Surface Transportation Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment Opportunities Under Climate Change: Case Study in Portland, Oregon
• Impact of Jobs–Housing Balance on Average Jurisdiction Commuting Times: Virginia Macroscopic Analysis
• Integrating Travel Demand Model and Benefit–Cost Analysis for Evaluation of New Capacity Highway Projects
• Lessons Learned from Four Alternative Transportation System Partnership Endeavors in Public Lands
• Modeling the Effects of Shuttle Service on Transportation System Performance and Quality of Visitor Experience in Rocky Mountain National Park
• Operating a Metropolitan Planning Organization: Internal Funding, Work Programs, and Consultant Balance
• Resource Guide for Enhancing the Incorporation of Safety into the Regional Planning Process
• Toward a Better State Climate Action Plan: Review and Assessment of Proposed Transportation Strategies
• Using Traffic Simulation Software to Manage Recreational River Boats on Public Lands