01154322

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2144-09

http://scholar.google.com...tala&publication_year=2010

The development of bus rapid transit (BRT) systems is relatively recent in the United States; however, several systems are operating and many more are being planned. More comprehensive understanding is needed of the relationship between land use and BRT, particularly in comparison with other fixed-guideway modes. This paper describes an effort to quantify the impacts of BRT stations on the values of surrounding single-family homes. The hypothesis is that BRT stations have an impact on property value that is commensurate with rail transit projects, considering the level and permanence of services and facilities. To test that hypothesis, a hedonic regression model was used to estimate the impact of distance to a BRT station on the fair market value of single-family homes. Because many BRT systems operating in the United States may be too new to find evidence of capitalization into property values, data from East Busway, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, one of the oldest operating BRT systems in the country, were used. Decreasing marginal effects were found: moving from 101 to 100 ft from a station increases property value approximately $18.90; moving from 1,001 to 1,000 ft increases property value by approximately $2.71. The results shown in this paper are valid only for the data used in Pittsburgh’s case. As more BRT systems continue to operate in the United States, this method should be applied to other cities and other types of properties to gain a better understanding of the general impacts of proximity to BRT.

01323856

10-4017

English

pp 72-79

2010

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309160469

Print

Maps (1) ; References (24) ; Tables (3)

Bus rapid transit; Bus terminals; Economic impacts; Land use; Property values; Regression analysis

Pittsburgh (Pennsylvania)

Economics; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I10: Economics and Administration; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 25 2010 12:04PM

• Art in Transportation: Multimodal Overview
• Bicycling and Transit: A Marriage Unrealized
• Estimating Transit Accessibility with an Alternative Method Evidence from Broward County, Florida
• Five-Phase Approach to Improve Design of Printed Transit Information and to Monitor Impact on Customer Satisfaction
• Impact of Miami, Florida, Urban Partnership Agreement Phase 1A on Transit User Perceptions of I-95 Express Bus Service
• Impacts of Gasoline Prices on New Jersey Transit Ridership
• Intermodal Transfer Between Bicycles and Rail Transit in Shanghai, China
• Is Light Rail More Attractive to Users Than Bus Transit? Arguments Based on Cognition and Rational Choice
• Measuring the Gap Between Car and Transit Accessibility: Estimating Access Using a High-Resolution Transit Network Geographic Information System
• Modeling the Spatial Impacts of Public Transport on Traffic Congestion Relief in Melbourne, Australia
• Monocentric City with Discrete Transit Stations
• Operationalizing Place Making in a Choice Experiment Context
• Optimization Methodology of Project Construction Scheduling for Intermodal Terminal Planning Problems
• Quantifying the Benefits: Application of Customer Loyalty Modeling in Public Transportation Context
• Regional and Modal Variability in Effects of Gasoline Prices on U.S. Transit Ridership
• Social Experiment to Encourage Drive-Alone Commuters to Try Transit
• Travel Time and Transfer Analysis Using Transit Smart Card Data
• Using Quantitative Methods in Equity and Demographic Analysis to Inform Transit Fare Restructuring Decisions
• Wayfinding-Oriented Design for Passenger Guidance Signs in Large-Scale Transit Center in China
• What Does It Take for Shuttles to Succeed? Comparison of Stated Preferences and Reality of Shuttle Success in New Jersey