TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Miles per Gallon Illusions and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Distortions: When Even Transport Experts Have Trouble

Accession Number:

01154712

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States
Order URL: http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/Energy_and_Global_Climate_Change_2010_164973.aspx

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/9780309160667

Abstract:

Correctly interpreting the fuel consumption implications of improvements in vehicle fuel economy is important for the optimal selection of policies to achieve greenhouse gas reductions and energy independence. The findings of two surveys of transportation professionals are reported. It was found that transportation professionals—those individuals charged with the design and implementation of transportation policy—correctly interpreted fuel savings of vehicle replacement policies more often when fuel economy was presented in gallons per 100 mi than when it was presented in miles per gallon. By means of a discrete choice model, it was shown that transportation experts were more likely to calculate fuel savings with a linear approach when given fuel economy in miles per gallon. One important implication of this finding can be seen in how the standard fuel economy metrics have resulted in distorted incentives in U.S. corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards. It was found that CAFE standards did not directly motivate fuel savings in determining penalties, credit transfers between model years, and maximum allowable adjustments for both flex-fueled vehicles and credit transfers for different vehicle classes. The most notable result is an overemphasis on incentives for improvements in fuel economy to passenger vehicles and an underemphasis on improvements for light trucks. These effects are distinct from well-known distortions associated with setting different standards for each vehicle class. Further, they might have been avoided had standards been written for gallons per mile. These findings point to the importance of understanding how people process information to improve policies targeting fuel savings.

Monograph Accession #:

01329904

Report/Paper Numbers:

10-2359

Language:

English

Authors:

Rowan, Dana
Karner, Alex
Niemeier, Deb

Pagination:

pp 8-15

Publication Date:

2010

Serial:

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Issue Number: 2191
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

9780309160667

Media Type:

Print

Features:

Figures (2) ; References (30) ; Tables (3)

Identifier Terms:

Subject Areas:

Energy; Highways; Vehicles and Equipment; I90: Vehicles

Files:

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Created Date:

Jan 25 2010 11:05AM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: