01155004

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2191-17

http://scholar.google.com...Song&publication_year=2010

Unlike much of the previous research on this topic, which assesses the economic consequences of failed deliveries to the home, this study examines the issue of failed delivery from a carbon-auditing perspective. It considers the potential environmental savings from the use of alternative forms of collection and delivery over traditional delivery methods for failed home deliveries. With a spreadsheet carbon audit model, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions for a failed delivery are calculated on the basis of a typical van home delivery round of 120 drops and 50-mi (80-km) distance. Three first-time delivery failure rates (10%, 30%, and 50%) are assessed. The additional CO2 from a second delivery attempt increases the emissions per drop by 9% to 75% (depending on the delivery failure rate). The vast majority (85% to 95%) of emissions emanating from a traditional failed delivery arise not from the repeat van delivery but from the personal travel associated with the customer’s collecting a missed redelivery from the carrier’s local depot. A range of collection–delivery points (CDPs) (supermarkets, post offices, railway stations) were all found to reduce the environmental impact of this personal travel. Post offices (currently operating a CDP system through the U.K. Royal Mail’s Local Collect service) yielded the greatest savings, creating just 13% of the CO2 produced by a traditional collection by car from a local depot. Overall, the research suggests that the use of CDPs offers a convenient and more environmentally friendly alternative to redelivery and customer collection from a local parcel depot.

01329904

10-1901

English

pp 136-143

2010

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309160667

Print

Figures (2) ; References (46) ; Tables (2)

Carbon dioxide; Delivery service; Environmental impacts; Exhaust gases; Package service

Collection and delivery points; Failed home deliveries

United Kingdom

Environment; Freight Transportation; I15: Environment

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 25 2010 10:52AM

• Abating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Through Cash-for-Clunker Programs
• Analysis of Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Activity and Fuel Economy Based on Electronic Control Module Data
• Analyzing Impact of Intermodal Facilities on Design and Management of Biofuel Supply Chain
• Climate Change and Urban Transportation in Latin America: Analysis of Recent Projects
• Compressed Air Vehicles: Drive-Cycle Analysis of Vehicle Performance, Environmental Impacts, and Economic Costs
• Cost-Effectiveness Assessment of Low-Carbon Vehicle and Fuel Technologies
• Economic Assessment of Electric-Drive Vehicle Operation in California and Other U.S. Regions
• Effect of Wide-Based Single Tires on Fuel Efficiency of Class 8 Combination Trucks
• Estimating the Impact of Electric Vehicle Charging on Electricity Costs Given Electricity-Sector Carbon Cap
• Field Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Emissions at High Speeds
• Freight Transport, Energy Use, and Emission Trends in Spain
• Genetic Algorithm–Based Approach to Develop Driving Schedules to Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles
• Implications of Bioeconomy-Based Fuel Production for Transportation Infrastructure in Iowa
• Improved Vehicle-Specific Power Bins for Light-Duty Vehicles in Estimation of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Beijing
• Macroscopic Model of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Municipalities
• Miles per Gallon Illusions and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Distortions: When Even Transport Experts Have Trouble
• Recharging Behavior of Households’ Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles: Observed Variation in Use of Conversions of 5-kW-h Blended Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle
• Societal Life-Cycle Buy-Down Cost of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles
• Strategy for Overcoming Cost Hurdles of Plug-In-Hybrid Battery in California: Integrating Post-Vehicle Secondary Use Values
• Toward Integration of Vehicle and Fuel Regulation: California Case Study
• Vermont Integrated Land Use and Transportation Carbon Estimator