01137509

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2105-07

http://scholar.google.com...dman&publication_year=2009

This paper documents the results of a pilot test done for the Oregon Household Travel Survey. The pilot was designed to enable the Oregon Department of Transportation to determine the role of a Global Positioning System (GPS) in the upcoming survey effort. Specifically, a three-pronged approach was employed. Households were randomly selected for inclusion in the study and then assigned to one of three groups: (a) the traditional survey approach, (b) the traditional approach with GPS, and (c) GPS only. A total of 299 households from the city of Portland, Oregon, were recruited into the pilot, with 235 completing all required activities. A comprehensive evaluation of the similarities and differences in results across the three groups showed differences in respondent burden, completeness of travel details obtained, and costs. Results from this experiment also showed differences in nonresponse bias. The traditional survey had an expected nonresponse for the large households, low-income households, and young adults. Minority participation was on par with census figures. The GPS groups showed higher participation rates for young adults and nonminorities. These data confirmed the general thought that GPS was an effective tool for mitigating nonresponse among young adults. However, the minority nonresponse bias increased significantly with technology, suggesting that other methods would be more appropriate. With regard to completeness of data, geocoding rates are higher for the GPS groups, and there are significant differences in trip departure times, which could affect peak hour and time-of-day modeling. As expected, the costs were higher for the GPS groups, but the expectation is that these costs will fall as processes are standardized across studies and new technologies are introduced.

01141653

09-3165

English

pp 51-56

2009

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309126205

Print

Figures (1) ; References (14) ; Tables (5)

Bias (Statistics); Costs; Data quality; Demographics; Global Positioning System; Households; Low income groups; Minorities; Pilot studies; Socioeconomic factors; Travel surveys; Young adults

Nonresponse (Surveys)

Portland (Oregon)

Data and Information Technology; Highways; Planning and Forecasting; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 30 2009 7:34PM

• A Semidirective Interview Method to Analyze Behavioral Changes: A Focus on Two Case Studies
• Bayesian Training and Committees of State-Space Neural Networks for Online Travel Time Prediction
• Development of Geolocation Data Compression for Transportation Target Identification
• Distributed Approach for Estimation of Dynamic Origin–Destination Demand
• Driver-Assisted Bus Interview: Passive Transit Travel Survey with Smart Card Automatic Fare Collection System and Applications
• Efficiency and Effectiveness of Cell Phone Samples in Transportation Surveys
• Forecasting Network Data: Spatial Interpolation of Traffic Counts from Texas Data
• Generating Internationally Comparable Figures on Long-Distance Travel for Europe
• Improving the Usability of a Complex Household Travel Survey: An Evaluation of User Requirements
• Kinematic Terrestrial Light-Detection and Ranging System for Scanning
• Measuring and Estimating Suppressed Travel with Enhanced Activity–Travel Diaries
• Model-Based Synthesis of Household Travel Survey Data in Small and Midsize Metropolitan Areas
• Participatory Geographic Information Systems and Active Transportation: Collecting Data and Creating Change
• Processing Raw Data from Global Positioning Systems Without Additional Information
• Transport and Surveillance Aspects of Location-Based Services
• Vehicle Detection from Satellite Images: Intensity-, Chromaticity-, and Lane-Based Method