01088556

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2042-11

http://scholar.google.com...osza&publication_year=2008

An overview and a comparison of several new-generation personal rapid transit (PRT) technologies are provided. A total of about 40 known PRT concepts existed as of 2007, of which 19 were being actively developed (i.e., not dormant, with some testing completed). Of the 19, 10 had readily accessible operational specifications, enabling an assessment and comparison. Ten operational parameters were considered for each of the technologies. A throughput of 7,200 passengers per hour on a single-track PRT line is possible with a minimum headway of 1.0 s, line speed of 35 km/h, and braking rate of 9.8 m/s² (i.e., Gx). A minimum headway of 0.5 s is possible either at low speeds (<20 km/h) or with hard emergency braking (≥2Gx). PRT technologies proposing values that exceed these limits may not be feasible. To accommodate short headways and high emergency braking rates, controls that require seated passengers should be considered. Only Urban Light Transport and Vectus feature a full slate of either feasible or fundamental (i.e., preferable) operating characteristics. CyberCab and MISTER would be more feasible with decreases in minimum headway and line speed, respectively. The other technologies are partially feasible, unclear in terms of certain characteristics, or better classified as “high-speed” PRT. The findings may facilitate the formulation of PRT standards and operating criteria. These, along with a successful implementation of PRT at Heathrow Airport in England, may generate new markets and competitive technologies. Further studies comparing guideway design, materials, switching, station design, visual impacts, costs, and financing are needed.

01106157

English

pp 101-108

2008

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309113090

Print

Figures; Photos; References (26) ; Tables (2)

Braking; Headways; Operating speed; Personal rapid transit; Technological innovations; Technology assessment

Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 29 2008 3:20PM

• Active Transit Signal Priority for Streetcars: Experience in Melbourne, Australia, and Toronto, Canada
• Air Passenger Preferences for Choice of Airport and Ground Access Mode in the New York City Metropolitan Region
• Analysis of Transit Quality of Service and Employment Accessibility for the Greater Chicago, Illinois, Region
• Boarding and Alighting Experiments: Overview of Setup and Performance and Some Preliminary Results
• Cluster-Based Optimization of Urban Transit Hub Locations: Methodology and Case Study in China
• Commuter Rail Circulator Route Network Design and Its Implications for Transit Accessibility
• Investigating Consistency in Transit Passenger Arrivals: Insights from Longitudinal Automated Fare Collection Data
• Light Rail Cost Functions and Technical Inefficiency
• Process Management in Public Transit Planning: Case Study of Introduction Project of Light Rail Transit in Toyama, Japan
• Service Orientation, Bus-Rail Service Integration, and Transit Performance: Examination of 45 U.S. Metropolitan Areas
• Successful Historic Streetcar Service: Learning from the San Francisco, California, Experience