TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Noise Modeling Using ISO 9613-2 for Designing Facilities to Meet a Not-to-Exceed Community Noise Limit

Accession Number:

01054354

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Institute of Noise Control Engineering

Iowa State University, 210 Marston Hall
Ames, IA 50011-2153 United States

Abstract:

Noise modeling is a vital part of designing any facility with fixed noise sources in order to meet community noise limits, and ISO 9613-2 is the most commonly used methodology in models to predict outdoors propagation. Although many types of noise limits are encountered for facilities – industrial, commercial, or institutional, an A-weighted not-to-exceed limit is the most common. As atmospheric conditions substantially affect actual levels, the relationship between atmospheric conditions and predicted noise levels needs to be understood. ISO 9613-2 (hereafter 9613) predicts, at least it is intended to predict, a long-term average downwind level during conditions favorable to propagation, including mild inversions. The accuracy and adequacy of the methodology in 9613 have long been questioned. Recent measurements by Schomer2 suggest that 9613 predicts for average crosswind rather average downwind conditions. Because 9613 predicts a long-term downwind average, actual levels will – by the definition of average – sometimes, and possibly frequently, exceed the predicted average level. The percentage of the time the predicted level will be exceeded, and by how much, is not known. A not-to-exceed limit may need to be met under near-worst case atmospheric conditions that are more severe and occur less frequently than the average conditions of 9613. ISO 9613-2 is probably the most widely used international standard, and has been used successfully for designing a great many facilities to meet noise limits. There seems to be a dichotomy between successful results and known deficiencies in 9613. In general, 9613 works for many conditions, and does not work as well for others. This paper summarizes deficiencies in 9613 and then attempts to answer the following questions: (1) What is predicted by 9613? (2) When does 9613 give reasonably accurate results, and when are they less accurate? (3) Does 9613 predict what it claims to predict? (4) Is a 9613 average suitable for designing to meet a not-to-exceed limit? When and how 9613 can be used successfully? Another question is raised but cannot be answered, namely, how often can a not-to-exceed limit be exceeded and still be acceptable for design purposes. Design strategies are also suggested.

Monograph Accession #:

01054353

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Institute of Noise Control Engineering

Iowa State University, 210 Marston Hall
Ames, IA 50011-2153 United States

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Brittain, Frank

Editors:

Burroughs, Courtney B
Maling, George C

Pagination:

pp 861-873

Publication Date:

2004

Conference:

Noise-Con 04. The 2004 National Conference on Noise Control Engineering

Location: Baltimore Maryland, United States
Date: 2004-7-12 to 2004-7-14
Sponsors: Institute of Noise Control Engineering; Transportation Research Board

Media Type:

CD-ROM

Features:

Figures (5) ; References (36) ; Tables (1)

Uncontrolled Terms:

Subject Areas:

Design; Energy; Environment; Highways; I15: Environment

Files:

TRIS, TRB

Created Date:

Jul 26 2007 1:25PM