01025415

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1986-22

http://scholar.google.com...Akin&publication_year=2006

A simple, practical tool based on integration (basically, shortening) of competing bus and minibus transit services is provided for estimating increased ridership on metro lines. A simple model is developed to estimate the increased ridership in the metro line of Istanbul, Turkey (7.9 km long and being extended), caused by integration with bus and minibus transit lines, and the benefits related to the intermodal integration are presented. To estimate the effectiveness of the integration action, ridership information in all modes before and after the integration was gathered and analyzed. It was found that the ridership-over-capacity (RoC) ratio in the metro lines was quite low (0.28) before the integration. On December 24, 2001, a partial integration was deployed by the bus operator of the metropolitan city when 11 bus and three minibus routes were integrated to the metro, which yielded significant increase in RoC (56%). The study also considered possible options for the development of a full intermodal plan. In this regard, existing bus and minibus transit lines were examined, and 33 bus and three minibus routes were recommended for integration. It was found that such integration would increase RoC from 0.28 to 0.76 without any significant increase in operating cost. Also, the city and private bus and minibus operators would save an estimated of $4.8 million a year from cuts in operating these services along the metro route. It was also estimated that the integration would lower the amount of bus traffic in downtown Taksim and Mecidiyeköy by approximately 25% and 38%, respectively.

01042059

English

pp 162-171

2006

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

030909996X

Print

Figures (3) ; References (11) ; Tables (8)

Before and after studies; Bus transit; Case studies; Integrated systems; Intermodal transportation; Metropolitan areas; Minibuses; Operating costs; Public transit; Ridership; Subways

Transit capacity

Istanbul (Turkey)

Highways; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Mar 3 2006 10:19AM

• Algorithm for Optimal Bid Packaging for Competitive Contracting in Public Transit
• Allocating Revenues to Public Transit Operators Under an Integrated Fare System
• Bus-and-Rail and All-Bus Transit Systems: Experience in Dallas and Houston, Texas, 1985 to 2003
• Carsharing and Station Cars in Asia: Overview of Japan and Singapore
• Carsharing as Key Contribution to Multimodal and Sustainable Mobility Behavior: Carsharing in Germany
• Carsharing in North America: Market Growth, Current Developments, and Future Potential
• Competition in Bus Public Transport in Israel
• Cost per User as Key Factor in Project Prioritization: Case Study of San Francisco Bay Area, California
• Determinants of Perceived Importance of Targeted Transportation Services for Low-Income Riders
• Development of Asset Management Evaluation Framework in Rail Transit Environment: London Underground Public–Private Partnership
• Examination of Process of Innovation at Transit Systems
• Explaining Variation in Transit Ridership in U.S. Metropolitan Areas Between 1990 and 2000: Multivariate Analysis
• Impact of Public Transit on Employment Status: Disaggregate Analysis of Houston, Texas
• Interoperable Transit Smart Card Systems: Are We Moving Too Slowly or Too Quickly?
• Lean Manufacturing Techniques in Bus and Rail Maintenance: Study at Chicago Transit Authority in Illinois
• New Technologies for Sustainable Urban Transportation in Europe
• Relocation Simulation Model for Multiple-Station Shared-Use Vehicle Systems
• Ridership Accuracy and Transit Formula Grants
• Sketch Models to Forecast Commuter and Light Rail Ridership: Update to TCRP Report 16
• Sketch Transit Modeling Based on 2000 Census Data
• System Plan for California's Bay Area Regional Express Bus Service
• Transit Attractiveness: Systematic Approach to Transit Performance Measurement
• Who Is Attracted to Carsharing?