00978572

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1868-21

http://scholar.google.com...rsoy&publication_year=2004

Bridges without expansion joints are referred to as integral bridges. The abutment and the superstructure of integral bridges act as a single structural unit. As the temperature of an integral bridge changes, the length of the bridge increases and decreases. The changes push the abutment against the approach fill and pull it away and thus cause lateral deflections. The movement of the abutment into the approach fill develops passive earth pressure that is displacement dependent. Although earth pressures are detrimental for the substructure of a bridge, they are beneficial for the superstructure because they reduce the bending moments caused by the dead loads and the live loads in the bridge girders. Therefore, relying on the beneficial effects of the full passive earth pressures, regardless of the displacement, is not conservative. Charts are proposed to estimate the magnitude of the resultant force and the point of application of the resultant force as a function of the wall displacement. Medium-dense and dense granular backfill materials were considered in developing the charts. The need for estimating the maximum mobilized passive earth pressures for jointless bridges with cohesionless backfill may be fulfilled with the proposed charts.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1868, Soil Mechanics 2004.

00978551

English

p. 199-204

2004

Transportation Research Record

0309094623

Figures (6) ; References (29) ; Tables (1)

Backfill soils; Bridge abutments; Bridge superstructures; Charts; Cohesionless materials; Earth pressure

Integral bridges; Lateral deflection; Wall displacement

Geotechnology; Highways; I42: Soil Mechanics

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Sep 28 2004 12:00AM

• BIAXIAL TESTING TO INVESTIGATE SOIL-PIPE INTERACTION OF BURIED FIBER-REINFORCED CEMENT PIPE
• COMBINED MEASUREMENT OF UNKNOWN FOUNDATION DEPTHS AND SOIL PROPERTIES WITH NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION METHODS
• DESIGN OF SHORT AGGREGATE PIERS TO SUPPORT HIGHWAY EMBANKMENTS
• DEVELOPMENT OF A WIRELESS MONITORING SYSTEM FOR PILE DRIVING
• DOES ELASTIC ANISOTROPY SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT A TUNNEL'S PLANE STRAIN BEHAVIOR?
• DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS FOR POROUS ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE DESIGN
• EFFECT OF POSITIVE DRAINAGE ON FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT LIFE-CYCLE COST
• FOCUSING LANDSLIDE INVESTIGATION EFFORTS WITH GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM SCREENING TECHNIQUES
• HYDRATED LIME STABILIZATION OF SULFATE-BEARING VERTISOLS IN TEXAS
• INTELLIGENT COMPACTION WITH VIBRATORY ROLLERS: FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS IN AUTOMATIC COMPACTION AND COMPACTION CONTROL
• LABORATORY EVALUATION OF MIXING ENERGY CONSUMPTION AND ITS INFLUENCE ON SOIL-CEMENT STRENGTH
• LATERAL LOAD BEHAVIOR OF CAST-IN-DRILLED-HOLE PILES IN WEAKLY CEMENTED SAND
• MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH REINFORCEMENT TENSILE STRENGTH FROM TESTS OF GEOTEXTILE-REINFORCED SOIL
• MODELING AND LABORATORY ASSESSMENT OF CAPILLARY RISE IN STABILIZED PAVEMENT MATERIALS
• MONITORING RESULTS OF AN INSTRUMENTED, MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH WALL: COMPARISON WITH CURRENT PRACTICE
• NEURAL NETWORKS FOR RAPID REDUCTION INTERPRETATION OF SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF SURFACE WAVES RESULTS
• NEW ZEALAND EXPERIENCE WITH FOAM BITUMEN STABILIZATION
• PREDICTION OF PIER RESPONSE TO BARGE IMPACTS WITH DESIGN-ORIENTED DYNAMIC FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
• STRESS AND STRAIN MONITORING OF REINFORCED SOIL TEST WALL
• TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY FOR COMPACTION CONTROL OF STABILIZED SOILS