TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

EVALUATION OF PAST AUDITS OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ON CALIFORNIA STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM

Accession Number:

00936213

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States
Order URL: http://www.trb.org/Main/Public/Blurbs/152819.aspx

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/0309077443

Abstract:

The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is responsible for developing and maintaining the state highway system. Fourteen audits related to the Caltrans project delivery process have been conducted in the last 30 years, an average of about one every 2 years. Most of the audits cited expense and timeliness problems with project development. Yet neither the degree to which these audits accurately assessed the problems with project development nor the degree to which implementation of audit recommendations served to improve project development has been evaluated. The audit findings and recommendations were researched and compared with newly collected data from interviews with project managers involved in the development of highway projects throughout California. Findings indicate that many of the recommendations of past audits have not been implemented, do not apply, or, if implemented, do not appear to have materially changed or to have improved project development times or costs. A flaw of previous audits was the failure to directly involve project managers in identifying constraints on project development. Moreover, discussions with project managers suggest there is a need to update, review, and value-engineer an overly rigid project development process. Despite audit assertions that project delivery can be improved with more aggressive project management, project managers are not delegated the same level of authority as they are assigned responsibility. Thus, the role of the project manager in project planning, management, and quality control is administratively constrained. There is a need to develop new methods for conducting these types of audits so that major issues and problems are better defined before solutions are recommended.

Supplemental Notes:

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1817, Transportation Planning and Analysis 2002.

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Hecht, H
Niemeier, D

Pagination:

p. 1-10

Publication Date:

2002

Serial:

Transportation Research Record

Issue Number: 1817
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

0309077443

Features:

References (11) ; Tables (8)

Uncontrolled Terms:

Geographic Terms:

Subject Areas:

Administration and Management; Highways; I10: Economics and Administration

Files:

TRIS, TRB

Created Date:

Jan 29 2003 12:00AM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: