TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

COMPARISON OF DISTANCE ESTIMATES FOR COMMODITY FLOW SURVEY: GREAT CIRCLE DISTANCE VERSUS NETWORK-BASED DISTANCES

Accession Number:

00935395

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/0309077303

Abstract:

A study was conducted to compare distance estimates derived from great circle distances (GCD) with distance estimates derived from a network-based model. The study used a sample of shipments from the 1993 commodity flow survey (CFS). For each shipment in the sample, the distance from the zip code of origin to the zip code of destination was calculated by using the Oak Ridge National Laboratories National Highway Network and assuming that the minimum impedance path was utilized. For each of these origin-destination pairs, the GCD and several variations of the GCD also were estimated. Finally, the network-based estimates and the GCD-based estimates were statistically compared. As expected, distance estimates based on GCD were found to be different from network-based estimates. However, applying a constant circuity factor of 1.22 or using variable circuity factors based on distance category did not result in a statistical bias in these distance estimates. Examination of distance estimates at the level of origin-destination pair revealed that distance estimates could vary as much as 75%. A comparison of published values for the 1997 CFS with values derived from GCD-based distance estimates shows that approximately 5% to 35% of the GCD-based values for the 1997 CFS would fall outside a two standard error interval. Although GCD-based estimates, under some conditions, may produce unbiased estimates of the mean distance, this does not eliminate the need for network-based estimates.

Supplemental Notes:

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1804, Transportation Data and Information Technology Research.

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Qureshi, Muhammad Ahsan
Hwang, H-L
Chin, S-M

Pagination:

p. 212-216

Publication Date:

2002

Serial:

Transportation Research Record

Issue Number: 1804
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

0309077303

Features:

References (3) ; Tables (7)

Identifier Terms:

Subject Areas:

Highways; Planning and Forecasting; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

Files:

TRIS, TRB

Created Date:

Dec 13 2003 12:00AM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: