00977238

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1863-05

http://scholar.google.com...yers&publication_year=2004

In 2001, earthquakes in January (magnitude 7.7 in Gujarat, India), February (magnitude 6.8 near Nisqually, Washington), and June (magnitude 8.4 near Atico, Peru) damaged railroads. Their effects on railroad infrastructure, considered both in isolation and in comparison with other effects on railroad operations, are of interest to engineers with responsibility for railroad bridges and other railroad maintenance in seismically active regions. Although the overall effects on railroad operations were correlated with earthquake magnitude, damage to structures appeared more closely related to local conditions and details of design and construction. Track and roadbed damage resulted from settlement, slides, and rock falls. It was correlated with magnitude in both severity and extent and caused the most significant effect on operations in both the Gujarat and Atico earthquakes. Damage to railroad bridges included minor displacement of steel girder spans, cracking of joints in masonry piers and arches, separation of wing walls from abutments, collapse of masonry spandrel walls of arches, rotation and displacement of a framed dump bent in a timber trestle, and movement of piers of an open bascule span that prevented closing of the span. Damage to tunnels was minor. As for other railroad structures, there was widespread damage and destruction of masonry buildings, severe damage to a pedestrian viaduct over a railroad yard in India, significant damage to railroad buildings in Seattle from the Nisqually earthquake, and minor damage to buildings in Peru.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1863, Railroads: High-Speed Passenger Rail, Railway Bridges, and Track Design and Maintenance.

00977233

English

p. 37-44

2004

Transportation Research Record

0309094569

Figures (3) ; Photos (13) ; References (1) ; Tables (1)

Earthquakes; Infrastructure; Landslides; Loss and damage; Railroad bridges; Railroad buildings; Railroad tracks; Railroad tunnels; Rockfalls; Settlement (Structures)

Atico (Peru); Gujarat (India); Nisqually (Washington)

Bridges and other structures; Geotechnology; Highways; Railroads; Terminals and Facilities

TRIS, TRB

Aug 30 2004 12:00AM

• CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY EXPERIENCE WITH 136-LB THICK WEB RAIL SWITCH POINTS
• COMPARING OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH-SPEED RAIL AND MAGLEV SYSTEMS: CASE STUDY OF BEIJING-SHANGHAI CORRIDOR
• DEMAND-RESPONSIVE PRICING METHOD FOR THE PRODUCT LINE OF TAIWAN HIGH-SPEED RAIL
• DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A CONTINUOUS VERTICAL TRACK-SUPPORT TESTING TECHNIQUE
• DIRECT FIXATION TRACK DESIGN
• DYNAMIC CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF HIGH-SPEED RAILWAY BRIDGES
• HIGH-SPEED LINE AIRPORT CONNECTIONS IN EUROPE: STATE-OF-THE-ART STUDY
• INCREASING SPEEDS THROUGH THE DIVERGING ROUTE OF A TURNOUT WITHOUT INCREASING LEAD LENGTH
• INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RAILROAD ENTERPRISE ASSET MANAGEMENT: PRACTICAL APPROACH ON AMTRAK'S HIGH-SPEED NORTHEAST CORRIDOR RAILWAY LINE
• OBJECTIVE TRACK QUALITY INDICES
• RAILROAD ACCIDENT RATES FOR USE IN TRANSPORTATION RISK ANALYSIS