00804649

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1737-08

http://scholar.google.com...Long&publication_year=2000

Acceleration characteristics of starting vehicles are needed for many transportation analysis and design purposes involving driveways, turning bays, intersecting streets, traffic signals, railroad crossings, simulation software, and so forth. Constant acceleration is sometimes assumed, or AASHTO Green Book values based on piecewise-constant accelerations are sometimes adopted. However, continuing research has shown that linearly decreasing acceleration rates better represent both maximum vehicle acceleration capabilities and actual motorist behavior. It is not acceleration that usually is constant during speed changes; it is the rate of change in acceleration. The evolution of AASHTO acceleration values for design is traced, and the literature is reviewed for pertinent field observations. Linearly decreasing acceleration (and some deceleration) model parameters are calibrated for various sets of observational and design data. Despite published results from thousands of field measurements, the values selected for design were found to be based mostly on vehicle performance capabilities, with conjecture about how many of these capabilities are normally used by drivers. Design accelerations were found to deviate substantially from observed accelerations. At the start of motion, observed accelerations were about 15% faster for passenger cars and 45% faster for SU (single unit) trucks than design accelerations. As speed increased, observed accelerations dropped three to four times faster than design accelerations for these vehicles. Observed accelerations for WB-15 trucks began 40% to 75% slower than design accelerations, and they were considerably slower than the values in the Green Book for trucks at railroad crossings. Voids in the available information base are identified. Linearly decreasing design acceleration rates for motorists operating different classes of vehicles in different design situations are recommended, and revisions for Green Book parameters and charts are suggested. The recommended acceleration model greatly simplifies acceleration parameters but implies using different acceleration relationships for different design speeds instead of one for all.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1737, Geometric Design and Effects on Traffic Operations 2000.

English

p. 58-70

2000

Transportation Research Record

0309067405

Figures (4) ; References (21) ; Tables (2)

Acceleration (Mechanics); Automobiles; Behavior; Drivers; Highway design; Literature reviews; Mathematical models; Trucks; Vehicle performance

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

Design; Highways; Motor Carriers; Planning and Forecasting; I21: Planning of Transport Infrastructure

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 11 2001 12:00AM

• ANALYZING INFLUENCE OF GEOMETRIC DESIGN ON OPERATING SPEEDS ALONG LOW-SPEED URBAN STREETS: MIXED-MODEL APPROACH
• BENEFITS OF SPLIT INTERSECTIONS
• DESIGN OF ROUNDABOUTS IN FRANCE: HISTORICAL CONTEXT AND STATE OF THE ART
• EFFECTS OF HORIZONTAL CURVATURE ON DRIVER VISUAL DEMAND
• EFFECTS OF RIGHT-TURN LANES ON DRIVEWAY SIGHT DISTANCE
• EVALUATING HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT DESIGN CONSISTENCY OF TWO-LANE RURAL HIGHWAYS: DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PROCEDURE
• KINEMATIC APPROACH TO HORIZONTAL CURVE TRANSITION DESIGN
• PREDICTING OPERATING SPEEDS ON TANGENT SECTIONS OF TWO-LANE RURAL HIGHWAYS
• SPEED-PROFILE MODEL FOR TWO-LANE RURAL HIGHWAYS
• TURN LANE STORAGE LENGTH DESIGN: THEORY FOR THE PRACTITIONER
• UTILIZATION OF AUXILIARY THROUGH LANES AT INTERSECTIONS OF FOUR-LANE, TWO-WAY ROADWAYS