TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

VALIDATION OF LEFT-TURN DELAY AT TWO-WAY STOP-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS

Accession Number:

00802597

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/0309066891

Abstract:

Control delay for left-turning vehicles at unsignalized intersections was observed in the field and compared with average control delay calculated from the methodologies presented in the 1997 update of the "Highway Capacity Manual" (HCM). Unsignalized intersections with two-way left-turn lanes on the major street were observed in the peak and off-peak hours, and control delays were recorded for the one-state and two-state left-turn processes. Next, the methodologies presented in the HCM were used to calculate the control delay for both processes and compared with the observed data. These comparisons were used as the basis for validation of the HCM methodologies regarding left-turn control delay at unsignalized intersections. From the comparisons, the calculated delay closely corresponds with the observed data, with a total approach volume at the intersection of approximately 2,500 vehicles per hour or less. Once the total approach volume increases above this level, the calculated values rapidly increase and the actual observed control delays gradually increase at a much lower rate. As a result, the observed and calculated delays are different when the intersection handles more than 2,500 approach vehicles in an hour. Statistical analyses were performed on the data to determine if the average observed control delay was related to the calculated control delay. Statistically, the observed control delay and the calculated control delay at the 95% confidence level show that the two data sets yield similar results for off-peak conditions. However, during the peak hour, when the total approach volumes are higher, the 95% confidence interval yields different results. Hence, the HCM procedures produce, on average, greater control delay estimates than the field observations when the total approach volumes are high.

Supplemental Notes:

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1710, Traffic Flow Theory and Highway Capacity 2000.

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Simpson, S A
Matthias, J S

Pagination:

p. 181-188

Publication Date:

2000

Serial:

Transportation Research Record

Issue Number: 1710
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

0309066891

Features:

Figures (4) ; References (3) ; Tables (3)

Identifier Terms:

Subject Areas:

Data and Information Technology; Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; I71: Traffic Theory

Files:

TRIS, TRB

Created Date:

Nov 29 2000 12:00AM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: