00781447

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1685-25

http://scholar.google.com...Hunt&publication_year=1999

A land use and transportation interaction model was developed for the Sacramento, California, region, using the MEPLAN framework. The model represents land markets directly together with location-choice processes of different industry and household categories and the interactions among them. These resulting economic interactions lead to trip matrixes that are assigned to a multimodal, capacity-restrained transportation network, generating travel times and disutilities that influence the location-choice process in the period from 1990 to 2015. A range of different policy options is simulated for that period. Five different scenarios are compared with a trend scenario, three representing different long- and short-term government transportation supply scenarios, one representing incentives and disincentives to encourage land use patterns complementary to an improved transit system, and one combining the land-incentive scenario with higher prices for private vehicle use. The scenario predictions differ in mode choice, firm location, residential location, development patterns, vehicle kilometers traveled, and land rents. Various land uses are seen to be bidding against each other, and the differences in spatial arrangements between scenarios are quite complex and demonstrate the richness of the model. Certain changes take time to develop, demonstrating the need for a long-term approach to planning.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1685, Transportation Planning, Programming, Public Participation, and Land Use.

English

p. 199-208

1999

Transportation Research Record

0309071119

Figures (5) ; References (13) ; Tables (3)

Disincentives; Forecasting; Households; Incentives; Industries; Land use; Location; Mathematical models; Mode choice; Policy analysis; Rent; Transportation; Travel time; Trip matrices; Vehicle miles of travel

Disutility; Economic interactions

Sacramento (California)

Planning and Forecasting; Transportation (General); I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 5 2000 12:00AM

• (UN)PREDICTABILITY IN TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT DECISION MAKING
• ACCESSIBILITY INDICES: PILOT STUDY AND POTENTIAL USE IN STRATEGIC PLANNING
• ANALYSIS OF DEMAND FOR ROAD-BASED TRANSPORT FACILITIES: A BI-LEVEL PROGRAMMING APPROACH
• CHURCHMANS CROSSING INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT PROJECT: A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE SOLUTIONS
• DESIGNING AN EFFECTIVE APPROACH TO THE PUBLIC: ALASKA'S EXPERIENCE
• DRAFTING JAPAN'S NEW 5-YEAR ROAD IMPROVEMENT AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM: A NEW APPROACH
• FIRM LOCATION IN THE MEPLAN MODEL OF SACRAMENTO
• IDENTIFYING INTERMODAL CONNECTOR NEEDS: OREGON'S APPROACH
• IMPORTANCE OF PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT: A LOOK AT CAR-FREE CITY POLICY IN THE NETHERLANDS
• IN THE POSSIBILITIES ARE THE SOLUTIONS: ASSESSMENT AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE PUBLIC-INVOLVEMENT PROCESS DURING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY OF THE WOODROW WILSON BRIDGE
• INTEGRATING STATEWIDE PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING: A PRINCIPLE-BASED APPROACH
• ISSUES RELATING TO USE OF TRAVEL MODELS IN BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
• IT'S NOT JUST FOR PROJECTS ANYMORE: KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S INNOVATIVE, AGENCYWIDE PUBLIC-INVOLVEMENT PROGRAM
• LIGHT-RAIL-TRANSIT IMPACTS IN PORTLAND: THE FIRST TEN YEARS
• OPTIMIZING TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING WITH A MULTIOBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM MODEL
• PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND HOUSING AFFORDABILITY: CASE STUDY OF SAN FRANCISCO
• PEOPLE'S OPINIONS AND ROAD POLICIES: EFFECTS OF PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ACTIVITIES BY THE ROAD COUNCIL IN JAPAN
• RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR INTEGRATED URBAN MODELS
• SCENARIOS AND REGIONAL STRATEGIC TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
• STATEWIDE TRAVEL FORECASTING PRACTICE: A CRITICAL REVIEW
• THROUGH-TRIP TABLES FOR SMALL URBAN AREAS: A METHOD FOR QUICK-RESPONSE TRAVEL FORECASTING
• TOWARD REFLECTING PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF QUALITY OF SERVICE IN PLANNING, DESIGNING, AND OPERATING HIGHWAY FACILITIES
• TRAFFIC CALMING IN NEW DEVELOPMENTS: AVOIDING THE NEED FOR FUTURE FIXES
• TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY: FLORIDA'S EXAMPLE
• USING A TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DATABASE AND A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO IMPROVE PROJECT DELIVERY
• USING COMMODITY FLOW SURVEY DATA TO DEVELOP A TRUCK TRAVEL-DEMAND MODEL FOR WISCONSIN