00743701

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1604-08

http://scholar.google.com...Ross&publication_year=1997

For two decades, the city of Atlanta, Georgia, has used special public interest districts (SPIDs) to attract new development to and improve transit ridership around Midtown rail transit stations operated by the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA). Buildings locating inside SPIDs need not provide any parking facilities and can be developed more intensively than buildings located outside SPIDs. Buildings constructed outside SPIDs must have at least two parking stalls for every 1,000 sq ft (92.9 sq m) of gross leasable area and are limited to about 30 floors. The extent to which these policy objectives have been fulfilled by Atlanta's parking supply policies as they are applied around Midtown MARTA stations is analyzed. Findings are mixed. Development was attracted to SPIDs, and transit ridership among employees working within SPIDs was substantially higher than among those working outside SPIDs. On the other hand, new parking has proliferated throughout Midtown with some evidence to suggest that transit ridership has fallen as a result. It is concluded that without areawide parking supply efforts, policies patterned after Atlanta's SPID program will have limited success in improving transit ridership.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1604, Public Transit 1997: Planning, Management, Marketing, and New Technology.

English

p. 60-66

1997

Transportation Research Record

0309062071

Figures (2) ; References (7) ; Tables (6)

Districts and authorities; Office buildings; Parking facilities; Public policy; Public transit; Rail transit stations; Ridership

Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

Atlanta (Georgia)

Highways; Planning and Forecasting; Policy; Public Transportation; Terminals and Facilities

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 22 1997 12:00AM

• ACCESSIBLE LOW-FLOOR BUS: SYSTEM APPROACH IN FRANCE
• DEVELOPING A PERFORMANCE-BASED TRANSIT ALLOCATION FORMULA: CASE STUDY FOR A PARTICIPATORY PROCESS
• FEASIBILITY OF ADVANCED VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR TRANSIT BUSES
• HAVE WE LOST THE MESSAGE BEFORE GAINING THE KNOWLEDGE?
• IDENTIFYING NEW MARKETS FOR RAIL TRANSIT: CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR
• INDIANA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
• INFLUENCE OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ON POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT LOCATION
• INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR REVENUE CAPTURE AND CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT FOR TRANSIT
• INTEGRATED DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR EVALUATING TRANSIT AND LAND-USE COORDINATION POLICIES
• MOBILITY ANALYSIS OF TRANSIT SYSTEMS
• PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT: MODEL OF WALK TRIPS AND THEIR DESIGN AND URBAN FORM DETERMINANTS AROUND BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS
• PUBLIC TRANSPORT PRICING POLICY: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF REGIONAL BUS CARD SYSTEMS IN FINLAND
• RESEARCH ON CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSIT SERVICE DESIGN AND DELIVERY
• SYSTEMS PLANNING FOR CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT: CASE STUDY OF NEW JERSEY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
• TRANSIT FRIENDLINESS FACTOR: APPROACH TO QUANTIFYING TRANSIT ACCESS ENVIRONMENT IN A TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODEL
• TRANSIT INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR TRANSIT-DEPENDENT RIDERS
• TRANSIT SERVICE DESIGN AND OPERATION PRACTICES IN WESTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
• UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENCES IN PUBLIC TRANSIT: COMPARISON OF BOSTON AND TORONTO
• USE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF TRANSIT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS