00141411

Component

http://onlinepubs.trb.org...s/trr/1976/583/583-009.pdf

https://scholar.google.co...user&publication_year=1976

Consideration of the social status of transit user groups as something more than a marketing characteristics leads to discussion of the workability of certain basic transit planning goals and means. Distribution and maintenance of the quality of a resource (transportation) are viewed as functions of primary user group status, altruism, and power of the controlling agency. Race and sex are basic social status variables. Four user groups are examined-white and nonwhite males and females. Travel behavior and attitude data are presented from the 1960 and 1970 censuses for 11 cities and from a home-interview survey conducted in Trenton, New Jersey, in 1973 (N = 548). Census data show that increasing proportions of minorities use transit over the period of general decline of transit systems. Also shown is the high level of dependence on this declining- quality transit system by the lowest status users. The Trenton attitude and behavior data show that improvements in transit are likely to draw only low-status users and that their increasing presence might further discourage use by high-status travelers. Furthermore, only direct restrictions on automobile use are likely to turn high-status travelers to transit. The uncomfortable conclusion of this analysis of planning ends and means is that planning to provide a system primarily for those without alternative or placing faith in being able to attract riders to transit by dealing only with transit system attributes is shortsighted. To be successful over the long term, a system must be substantially used by high- status groups who will probably not be users by choice.

Publication of this paper sponsored by Committee on Social, Economic, and Environmental Factors of Transportation. Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

01411440

Conf Paper

pp 84-94

1976

Transportation Research Record

54th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board

0309024978

Print

Figures (1) ; References (14) ; Tables (5)

Attitudes; Gender; Level of service; Minorities; Public transit; Race; Ridership; Social class; Transportation planning; Travel patterns

Administration and Management; Highways; Public Transportation; Society

TRIS, TRB

Nov 3 1981 12:00AM

• ECONOMICS OF CAR OWNERSHIP AND USE BY TEENAGERS (ABRIDGMENT)
• IMPACT OF A BELTWAY ON A MEDIUM-SIZED URBAN AREA IN NORTH CAROLINA: A CASE STUDY (ABRIDGMENT)
• INCORPORATING ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS IN THE PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS
• ISSUE-ORIENTED APPROACH TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
• LESSONS FOR TRANSPORTATION POLICY DRAWN FROM PUBLIC HOUSING, URBAN RENEWAL, AND OTHER FIELDS
• MASSACHUSETTS ROUTE 128: A NONEMULATIVE ENIGMA
• PRAGMATIC EVALUATION OF TELEPHONES, ACTIVITY SCHEDULING, AND OTHER STRATEGIES TO MODIFY TRAVEL BEHAVIOR OF POPULATION SUBGROUPS (ABRIDGMENT)
• TIME-SERIES EFFECTS OF A LIMITED-ACCESS HIGHWAY ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES