00732269

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1549-06

http://scholar.google.com...lson&publication_year=1996

The aesthetic design process is sometimes limited to dealing solely with personal likes and dislikes, creating a totally subjective situation that leads to significant design decisions made on the basis of the strength of individual personalities rather than on any fundamental aesthetic content. A bridge type selection case study is provided to illustrate and discuss a technique to develop a logical process and bring some objectivity into aesthetic decisions. The case study involves a major 10-lane bridge 815 m (2,670 ft) long through an urban park. Because of the controversial nature of the project, a citizens' design committee was established to provide design oversight. Broad underlying issues such as land use, form and circulation, and scale and proportion were presented to the committee to form a baseline for subsequent activities. Open discussions with the committee were used to focus on the relative importance of each issue. On the basis of these discussions, aesthetic design criteria were developed in order to rank various alternatives. Conceptual designs, which were developed after preliminary discussions with the committee, were ranked by the committee according to how well each satisfied the previously established aesthetic design criteria. The recommended alternative, from an aesthetic standpoint, was simply the one with the highest ranking. Although aesthetic considerations will always involve questions of individual taste and opinion, the technique described can be used to bring a degree of objectivity to decisions about aesthetics.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1549, Transportation Aesthetics.

English

p. 48-53

1996

Transportation Research Record

0309059194

Figures (2) ; References (4) ; Tables (2)

Aesthetics; Alternatives analysis; Bridge design; Bridges; Case studies; Decision making; Design; Public participation; Ratings; Strategic planning; Structural design

Design criteria; Objectivity

Bridges and other structures; Design; Highways; Society; I24: Design of Bridges and Retaining Walls

TRIS, TRB

Feb 3 1997 12:00AM

• AESTHETIC DESIGN FOR AKASHI KAIKYO BRIDGE
• AESTHETIC DESIGN OF HANEDA SKY ARCH
• AESTHETIC DESIGN OF ODAWARA PORT BRIDGE
• AESTHETIC GUIDELINES FOR OLDER BRIDGES
• AESTHETICS AND OTHER COMMUNITY VALUES IN THE DESIGN OF ROADS
• APPLICATION OF AESTHETIC PRINCIPLES TO ROAD PLANTING IN CHINA
• BRITISH METHODS FOR IMPROVING SENSITIVITY OF BRIDGE DESIGNERS TO GOOD BRIDGE APPEARANCE
• FUSION OF CREATIVITY IN RAIL TRANSIT STATIONS: A RETROSPECTIVE AND CRITIQUE
• GLENWOOD CANYON TUNNEL AESTHETIC DESIGN
• INNOVATIVE COMPUTATIONAL SUPPORT IN BRIDGE AESTHETICS
• PARIS-LEXINGTON ROAD: INTEGRATION OF INTRINSIC QUALITIES, CIVICS OF DESIGN, AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY
• PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AS COLLABORATIVE ART: METROLINK, ST. LOUIS
• SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND AESTHETICS: THREE ASPECTS OF DESIGN EXCELLENCE
• VISUAL AND ECOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MODEL FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND DESIGN
• WASHINGTON, A CITY OF BEAUTIFUL BRIDGES: PARADIGMS TO EMULATE