01671134

Component

https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118758309

Roundabout capacity is primarily estimated by gap-acceptance or by geometric models. The 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 10) uses a gap-acceptance model developed by Siegloch with empirically derived values of critical gap and headway for single-lane and two-lane entries. A geometric capacity model was developed by Kimber and Hollis that diverged from gap-based models. The capacity of up to four lane entries was empirically derived from six geometric parameters. In 2012 capacity data were collected as part of the FHWA project, Assessment of Roundabout Capacity Models for the Highway Capacity Manual. These data were used to produce HCM6, an update of the HCM 2010. In HCM6, a capacity curve was fitted through all the capacity data for single-lane roundabouts. The large scatter of data about the mean capacity line suggests that the single-lane roundabouts may be separated into different geometric types to improve accuracy. To investigate this hypothesis, the capacity data were separated into two geometrically distinct types of single-lane roundabouts: smaller, compact and larger, curvilinear. The range of data for the disaggregated and aggregated data was compared. Also, a capacity line was derived for each type using the geometric capacity model and compared with the disaggregated data with the HCM6 method. The results demonstrate that differences in geometry, absent in HCM6, explain the wide data range. This was further confirmed by the geometric model that gave a good fit to both sets of data. These results indicate that the accuracy of capacity prediction is improved by including geometric variation.

18-01538

English

pp 10-19

2018-12

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Print

Figures (10) ; Photos; References (6) ; Tables (5)

Geometric design; Geometric elements; Highway capacity; Roundabouts; Single lane traffic

Highway Capacity Manual 2010

United States

Design; Highways; Operations and Traffic Management

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 22 2017 10:35AM

• A Comparative Analysis of Factors Affecting the Frequency and Severity of Freight-Involved and Non-Freight Crashes on a Major Freight Corridor Freeway
• A First Investigation of Truck Drivers’ Preferences and Behaviors using a Prototype Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control System
• Challenges in Hazard Detection for Commercial Motor Vehicle Drivers: A Driving Simulator Training Study
• Characteristics and Profiles of Moped Crashes in Urban Areas: An In-Depth Study
• How Roundabout Entry Design Parameters Influence Safety
• Risky Ride or Carefree Drive? An Analysis of Virginia’s Moped Safety and Registration Law on Operator Collision and Injury Outcomes
• Roadway-Related Truck Crash Risk Analysis: Case Studies in Texas
• Understanding Emerging Motorcyclist Segments in Crashes using Florida Crash Data and Statewide Survey
• Uniformity of Terminology for Circular Intersection Designs
• Using Deep Learning in Severity Analysis of At-Fault Motorcycle Rider Crashes
• Utilization of Gaps at Single-Lane Roundabouts