01665579

Component

https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118758030

https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118758030

Alternative design/alternative bids (ADAB) provides a mechanism for the asphalt and concrete paving industries to compete for the same paving project. It operates on the principle of the market pricing of each material determining which is most economical when the bids are opened, rather than selecting the pavement type during design based on a life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA). This paper reviews including LCC-based bid adjustment factors in the ADAB award decision. Data are from a survey that received responses from 40 U.S. Departments of Transportation (DOT) and the Canadian province of Ontario, and a content analysis of 55 ADAB project outcomes in 13 U.S. states and three Canadian provinces. Seven algorithms in use to calculate an ADAB bid adjustment factor were found, and six U.S. DOTs that award ADAB projects without an adjustment factor. The paper finds that the adjustment factor formula rarely influences the award decision and, generally, the pavement type with the lowest bid cost wins with or without the adjustment factor. The paper models the ADAB process in financial terms as an exercisable commodity option that accrues value from the differential rates of volatility between asphalt and concrete. It concludes that an LCC-based bid adjustment factor complicates the award process, creating potential for controversy over what the factor inputs are, and does not add value over bidding the pavement types head to head and awarding to the low bidder. The ADAB process increases the number of bidders and reduces unit bid prices for both pavement types.

18-01133

English

pp 21-27

2018

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Print

Figures (2) ; References (24) ; Tables (3)

Asphalt pavements; Bids; Concrete pavements; Life cycle costing; State departments of transportation; Surveys

Alternative design/alternative bid projects

Canadian Provinces

Construction; Highways; Pavements

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 22 2017 10:35AM

• A Decision Support Framework for Assessing the Contextual Factors for Complex Highway Projects
• Design, Fabrication, Construction, and Cost Assessment of Virginia’s First Corrosion Resistant ASTM A1010 Plate Girder Bridge
• Development of an Automated Remote Asphalt Paving Quality Control System
• Effective Post-Construction Evaluation Practices for Work Zone Management Strategies
• Effects of Mineral Additives on Cold Recycled Foamed Asphalt Mixtures Cured in Laboratory and Field Conditions
• Effects of Reheating Procedure and Oven Type on Performance Testing Results of Asphalt Mixtures
• Enhanced Model for Continuous Dielectric-Based Asphalt Compaction Evaluation
• Evaluation of Mix Designs for Rapid Construction of Bonded Concrete Overlays on Asphalt
• Feasibility of using QR Codes in Highway Construction Document Management
• First Application of UHPC Bridge Deck Overlay in North America
• Leveraging Intelligent Compaction and Thermal Profiling Technologies to Improve Asphalt Pavement Construction Quality: A Case Study
• Managing Public Communication Strategies in Accelerated Highway Construction Projects
• Risk-Based Prioritization of Construction Inspection
• The FHWA’s Demonstration Project for Enhanced Durability of Asphalt Pavements through Increased In-Place Pavement Density
• Timing of Cost Certainty in Highway Construction Project Delivery: Perceptions versus Empirical Results
• Unit Price or Lump Sum? A Stochastic Cost-Based Decision-Making Tool for Design-Bid-Build Projects