01649616

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2618-06

Speed limits on rural highways have recently been on an upward trend nationwide as 25 states have increased speed limits on such roadways between 2011 and 2016. In January 2017, Michigan House Bill 4423 (Public Act 445) was signed into law, which required speed limits to be raised from 55 to 65 mph on at least 900 mi of Michigan’s state-maintained nonfreeways. The specific highway segments were to be selected by the Michigan Department of Transportation (DOT) within 1 year of enactment on the basis of an assessment of travel speeds and safety. Research was undertaken to develop a process to select candidate highway segments for speed limit increases in Michigan. The primary objective was to identify rural highway segments with comparatively low safety risks for which costly geometric upgrades, specifically horizontal or vertical realignment, would be avoided. Ultimately, 12 factors and associated selection criteria were used to identify the candidate segments. These factors included segment length, total crash rate, injury crash rate, severe (fatal and A-injuries) crash rate, horizontal curvature, speed reduction zones, no-passing zones, schools (kindergarten through eighth grade), driveway density, lane width, paved shoulder width, and signalized intersections. Application of the candidate selection criteria to the Michigan DOT nonfreeway network yielded 772.8 centerline miles along 33 candidate segments, which represented approximately one-eighth of the network mileage currently posted at 55 mph. To avoid substantial geometric upgrade costs, speed limit increases were specifically not recommended for segments that would require horizontal or vertical realignment to achieve design speed compliance with the increased speed limit.

01624541

17-03190

English

pp 58-68

2017

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309441919

Digital/other

Figures; References; Tables

Geometric segments; Highway safety; Rural highways; Speed limits

Michigan

Highways; Operations and Traffic Management

TRIS, ATRI

Oct 23 2017 3:58PM

• Access Spacing Based on Turning-Vehicle Acceleration
• Computing the Minimal U-Turn Offset for an Unsignalized Superstreet
• Design Guidance for J-Turns on Rural High-Speed Expressways
• Empirical Speed Behavior on Horizontal Ramp Curves in Interchanges in the Netherlands
• In-Depth Investigation of Wrong-Way Crashes on Divided Highways in Alabama with Use of the Haddon Matrix and Field Observations
• Lane Utilization Model Development for Diverging Diamond Interchanges
• Operating Speed Models for Tangent Segments on Urban Roads
• Safety Effect of Diverging Diamond Interchanges on Adjacent Roadway Facilities