01620202

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2631-16

Reflective cracking in asphalt overlays placed over jointed concrete pavements is of major concern in Virginia, as well as nationally, and has generated interest in various reflective crack mitigation techniques that are easy to implement. One technique is the use of binder modifiers, such as asphalt rubber, polymer-modified asphalt binders, or high polymer–content (HP) modified binders. In the summer of 2014, the Virginia Department of Transportation placed an HP asphalt mixture produced by using an asphalt binder that contained approximately 7.5% styrene-butadiene-styrene polymer in a trial section within a subdivision as a low-risk means to assess constructability and laboratory performance. The HP mixture was evaluated in comparison with a typical surface asphalt mixture with a 9.5-mm nominal maximum aggregate size, as a control. Testing was performed on specimens fabricated from reheated control and HP mixture samples, as well as on specimens fabricated from site-compacted samples and road cores of the HP mixture. In addition, binder grading was performed on the control binder and modified binder. The HP binder was significantly more elastic than the control binder. Comparable dynamic moduli were found for reheated mixture specimens, although site-compacted and road core specimens from the HP mixture had lower stiffness than the control mixture. The HP mixture performed better in rutting and in fatigue. The Texas overlay test indicated similar crack resistance between the two mixtures; however, measured loads of the HP specimens were nearly half those of the control specimens. The results of laboratory testing indicated that the mixture incorporating the HP binder should have a far greater fatigue life and rut resistance than the control mixture.

01637861

17-06046

English

pp 144–152

2017

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309441506

Digital/other

Figures (7) ; References (9) ; Tables (6)

Asphalt mixtures; Cracking; Failure; Laboratory tests; Overlays (Pavements); Polymer asphalt; Rutting; Styrene butadiene styrene

Virginia

Highways; Materials; Pavements

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 8 2016 12:26PM

• Characterization of Permanent Deformation of Asphalt Mixtures with Minimum Strain Rate, LVECD Program, and Triaxial Stress Sweep Test
• Comparing the Performance of Fiberglass Grid with Composite Interlayer Systems in Asphalt Concrete
• Effect of Pore Water Pressure on Response of Asphalt Concrete
• Evaluation of Small Specimen Geometries for Asphalt Mixture Performance Testing and Pavement Performance Prediction
• New and Simpler Cracking Test Method for Asphalt Mix Designs
• Numerical Modeling and Artificial Neural Network for Predicting J-Integral of Top-Down Cracking in Asphalt Pavement
• Overlay Tester Results from Dense-Graded Asphalt Concrete Mixes: Accuracy in Characterizing Crack Susceptibility
• Practical Method to Determine Strain Level for Cyclic Direct Tension Fatigue Testing in the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester
• Sensitivity of the Illinois Flexibility Index Test to Mixture Design Factors
• Short-Term Performance and Evolution of Material Properties of Warm- and Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements: Case Studies
• The Logit Model and the Need to Reproduce the Stiffness Degradation Curve of Asphalt Specimens During Fatigue Testing
• Use of Digital Image Correlation for the Evaluation of Flexural Fatigue Behavior of Asphalt Beams with Geosynthetic Interlayers
• Use of Fine Aggregate Matrix Experimental Data in Improving Reliability of Fatigue Life Prediction of Asphalt Concrete: Sensitivity of This Approach to Variation in Input Parameters
• Use of Nonlinear Acoustic Measurements for Estimation of Fracture Performance of Aged Asphalt Mixtures
• Viscoelasticplastic–Fracture Modeling of Asphalt Mixtures Under Monotonic and Repeated Loads